--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> >
> > In my dream, I submitted a short paper to Bush about my analysis 
> > of a small town called Sausalito in California.  He read it and 
> > appeared to approve the contents of the report.  But he soon 
> > rewrote the paper to include his own thoughts using words that 
> > came from prior reports, using typical government phrases and 
> > presentation. In the end, the report became a thick analysis of 
> > what was supposed to be an informal paper.
> > 
> > I then found out that he actually had bought a piece of land 
> > several miles north of the town. He was farming the land for 
> > his own interest.
> > 
> > This is an interesting dream in that I'm not a registered 
> > Republican nor have I voted for him when he was running for 
> > president.
> > 
> > Does anyone know what the symbolism of this dream means?
> 
> You clearly have unresolved sexual issues with 
> George W. Bush. The "paper" being "rewritten" by
> Bush echoes similar issues expressed often by 
> THE CORRECTOR on this forum, who seems to believe
> as you do that anyone having a different opinion
> of one of your opuses than you do is a not only
> "attacking" you, but also making a veiled comment 
> on the diminutive stature of your penis. (This fear, 
> as far as I can tell, is shared equally by you and 
> THE CORRECTOR.) 
> 
> Bush wishing to turn your deep, spiritual insights 
> into cold, hard profit reveals your latent fear
> and distrust of Maharishi. Long suppressed, this
> fear cannot come out overtly because of decades of
> cult conditioning, and must be expressed covertly 
> by picking some other public figure who lacked any 
> sense of ethics and would do anything for a buck.
> 
> "Buying up land near to the town you like" is just
> as clearly a veiled desire to have either Maharishi
> or Bush cozy up next to you and fondle your buttocks. 
> Just sayin'.
> 
> Hey...you asked.  :-)
>

Barry, as usual, you continue to follow your modus operendi.  It appears that 
your analysis reflect your own state of consciousness.  Let's leave it at that 
for the time being.




Reply via email to