Followup post below.

--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Our summer of Tom Cruise's madness and Katie Holmes' creepy path 
> toward zombie bridedom has been a useful reminder of how truly strange 
> Scientology is. By now those interested in the Cruise-Holmes saga may 
> be passingly familiar with the church's creation myth, in which an 
> evil, intergalactic warlord named Xenu kidnaps billions of alien life 
> forms, chains them near Earth's volcanoes, and blows them up with 
> nuclear weapons. Strange as Scientology's pseudo-theology may be, 
> though, it's not as entertaining as the life story of the church's 
> founder, L. Ron Hubbard."
> 
> 
> http://www.slate.com/id/2122835/

I didn't read the article, but enjoyed a few posts from 
readers. Here's a good one for those of us who take 
issue with religions in general:

Subject:        Media Hypocrisy
From:   Arkady
Date:   Jul 15 2005 7:49PM

I have no problem with the media bashing L. Ron Hubbard and the absurdities of 
Scientology. What I have a problem with is this double standard in the media 
whereby L. 
Ron Hubbard is the only major religious founder it's OK to bash in polite 
company, and 
whereby we're all supposed to pretend Scientology is the only religion built on 
a pack of 
absurdities.

Are L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology any weirder than Joseph Smith and the Church 
of 
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints? It'd be nice to see the media take the 
license they feel 
when going after Scientologists and focus it on Mormons. "Gee, what do you 
know, I just 
found a whole new Testament, from the Angel Moron... errr, make that the Angel 
Moroni. 
It says we should have lots of wives.... errr, forget that one, let's pretend I 
never said that, 
shall we?" One thing's for sure, there's nothing in Scientology history to 
compare with 
Mountain Meadows.

Or how about the Seventh Day Adventists? That whole movement got started with 
some 
hilariously off-base predictions about the coming of the end of the world. Over 
a century 
later, they're still waiting, but it sure hasn't dampened enthusiasm for their 
false prophets. 
They just conveniently transitioned from waiting with bated breath for the end 
of the 
world to selling corn flakes to keep the sexual urges down.

Don't think I'm just picking on Johnny-come-lately religions, either. Look at 
Christianity. 
The orthodox theology of Christianity is downright hilarious. God is three 
beings at once, 
one of whom got himself crucified in the early first century of the common era, 
then his 
corpose made like a zombie and wandered around frightening people and taunting 
them 
to stick their fingers in its wounds. And let's not forget the Adventists 
hardly have the 
market cornered on ridiculously false prophecies. The Nazarene Rabbi Jesus is 
reported in 
the Gospels to have said that the end of the world would come in the time of 
his own 
generation. Roughly 2000 years after that generation passed away, the 
Christians STILL 
haven't wised up to the fact that their guy was just another cheap shyster 
revivalist, 
preaching impending apocolypse to get the knickers of the credulous in a twist.

Or how about Judaism? That's such a fundamentally evil religion that they 
celebrate 
Passover! Passover, in case you're one of the few people still blissfully 
ignorant of the 
barbaric tradition, was a mythical act of horrifying terrorism, when the 
super-powered 
being Yahweh went door to door mericlessly slaughtering innocent first borns in 
order to 
try to try to force a political solution on the government of Egypt. For some 
reason, the 
Jews think that's worth celebrating, even though their own conception of that 
same 
Yahweh would tell them that he could have teleported their ancestors right out 
of Egypt 
without having to spill untold amounts of innocent blood for his entertainment. 
Nor is that 
an isolated event act of evil for the loathsome Yahweh. The same "God" ordered 
the 
genocide at Jericho, tortured his own follower Job for the sake of a petty bet, 
and once 
threw such a tantrum about his seriously screwed-up creation that he drown 
nearly every 
living thing on the planet.

Or how about Buddhism? The meaning of life: getting reborn enough times that 
you don't 
have to be reborn again and you can go back to the state of one-ness with the 
universe 
you were in before getting born in the first place. Yeah, that's efficient. Or 
Islam: "You 
know, Judaism's pretty cool, but what it needs is a few more senseless rules 
and empty 
ceremonies.... the thousands already in the Torah simply aren't burdensome 
enough." Or 
Hinduism: "Hey, stick a few more arms on that deity, and we'll really have 
something!"

With such a rich pageant of disgusting absurdities to draw on, the media 
tendency to pick 
on Scientology while treating other religions as above question just strikes me 
as 
incredibly small-minded.

http://fray.slate.msn.com/?id=3936&m=15141027&;




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to