--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2010, at 10:28 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote: > > > Ok Sal, I'm going to give it right back to you. I > > remember when the John Edwards mistress, love child > > story broke. You totally ridiculed me for buying into > > it, because the story was broken by, OMG, "The National > > Enquirer". > > Sounds *very* unlikely, lurk, as I've said here, more > than once, that the NI usually gets its stories right, > and has ever since the OJ Simpson case. Care to > find the posts? I tried to find some but they didn't > appear to exist. (And no, I haven't deleted any.) > Would you like to try?
Funny, I didn't have any trouble finding them: 184848 184871 184878 184912 Here's 184878: ----- "Thanks, boo, that's what I was thinking. Obviously the Enq knows they can't be sued or else they wouldn't print trash as if it were 'fact.' "I was kind of wondering why I hadn't seen the 'revelations' before lurk posted them, then I saw where they came from. "Really scraping the bottom of the barrel, aren't we, lurk? If this is how you and others support the Repugs, heaven help them. You and your party deserve each other." ----- She was wrong on two other counts in this post as well: the Enquirer has been successfully sued a number of times for publishing false information; and the story had already hit the MSM at this point. Sal wasn't the only one; boo_lives also embarrassed himself pretty thoroughly. The thread title was "Obama's Many Accomplishments," if anyone wants to see the whole discussion.
