--- In [email protected], "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcg...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: <snip> > > > > > Anyway, at the time you wrote something like: yeah, he > > > > > said the same thing when he was in Fairfield. > > > > > > > > > > Well, I think I've found on youtube what you were > > > > > referring to. > > > > > > > > No, Rick was tellling us what Obama had said in response > > > > to a question *he* asked Obama, not that Dennis Raimondi > > > > asked Obama. > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Stop being so fucking anally retentive, Judy. > > > > > > Reread what I wrote: "at the time you wrote SOMETHING LIKE..." > > > > > > When people are going on memory, as I obviously was, I > > > wasn't QUOTING him; it was a general comment. > > > > > > Take a fucking valium. > > > > Have you been drinking? Because you're talking > > absolute nonsense. What I was commenting on was > > your asking if the Raimondi video was what Rick had > > been talking about. Obviously you'd forgotten > > Then like the sweet little lady I know you can be you should > have written that instead of acting like a shrill witch.
What *are* you talking about? That *is* what I wrote, completely straightforwardly, nothing "shrill" about it. Where do you see "shrill" in this? "No, Rick was tellling us what Obama had said in response to a question *he* asked Obama, not that Dennis Raimondi asked Obama." And then I quoted what Rick had said. What I *do* get "shrill" about is your trying to make a huge deal out of an immediately corrected slip of the tongue and pretending it means Obama doesn't know presidents can't repeal laws all by themselves. That's just nuts. It's perfectly clear he was talking about executive orders. You don't do your own causes, whatever they may be, any good when you make silly claims like this. > > that > > Rick had reported how Obama had answered *his* > > question, or you wouldn't have said you thought > > Rick had been referring to the Raimondi video. > > Didn't have anything to do with "something like." > > > > This is all a crock anyway. You know it, I know it, > > everyone who reads your posts knows it. There's > > more than enough *legitimate* criticisms to be made > > of Obama; there's no need to make them up out of > > whole cloth.
