--- In [email protected], azgrey <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfiend" <jstein@> wrote: > <snip> > > Considering the extraordinarily mean-spirited viciousness > > the usual suspects have been gratuitously directing at her, > > she's been quite restrained. > > You must be joking. > > Right?
Wrong. THE CORRECTOR doesn't have enough ability to self-assess to joke. She's deadly serious in the *INTENT* of this post. And that *INTENT* is to Bash Barry and the other "usual suspects" on her personal enemies list. Bhakti Barbie has nothing to do with it. This Bash -- as with so many others -- has nothing whatsoever to do with the person she is supposedly "defending," just as her supposed defense of Chopra in her latest Bashing Curtis exercise has nothing to do with Chopra. She has bashed Chopra herself mercilessly in the past, and will do so again. She *loathes* Chopra, and has made that loathing clear in the past, both here and on a.m.t. She doesn't IMO give a flying fuck about *any* of the people she poses as "defending." They are nothing to her but *excuses* to let out the simmering hatred she continues to nurture for her "enemines" here on FFL -- the "usual suspects." Letting that hatred out is pretty much her entire act. It's her only form of release. She' s really got no other chops, except to repost something that someone else said and pass it off as if she invented it because she found it by Googling. Haven't you figure this *out* yet? Almost everyone else here has. You can tell by how few people bother to respond to any of her Bashes any more, even the Bashees. The "mean-spirited viciousness" she is really referring to in her "usual suspects" is that they have written her off as not worth their time to interact with. The only way she can think of to *make* herself worth their time is to Bash Them, hoping to taunt them into a head-to-head argument. At this point only Curtis falls for it, and he does so because IMO he still finds it entertaining. It's the exact same act as Willytex's, and run for exactly the same reason. She's trying to provoke an argument and get someone to focus their attention on her and argue with her so she can feel "whole" again. The irony of her pretending to "defend" someone called on "desperately seeking attention" is that THE CORRECTOR's whole *act* on FFL is itself about desperately seeking attention. Deprived of the attention she feels she deserves, she'll try to turn *this* into an argument, too, and attempt to suck both of us (and Curtis or Sal or do.rflex or bystanders not on her enemies list yet) into "debating" the Bash with her. But it's Just Another Bash. Not a "defense," unless you consider defending one's own attachment to one's own hatreds a defense. IMO it's a big, angry, desperate "Fuck you" shouted to the people who have committed the unpardonable sin of Not Taking Her Seriously, or worse, actually laughing at her. So have pity. Getting off by screaming "Fuck you!" at her long-term enemies while pretending to be "defending" someone else by doing so is the only form of sex THE CORRECTOR gets these days. We on the "enemies list" act as her blow-up sex dolls, and Bashing us and trying to taunt us into arguing with her is the only form of "intercourse" left to her since her vibrator Burt committed suicide by hurling itself off her night table. :-) Watch the *INTENT* of the posts, people, not the content. If there is *no other reason* for a person to intrude into a discussion between two other people *except* to Bash one of those people -- one whom she has a long, long history of Bashing -- then it's not *about* the supposed "content" of the intrusion. It's about the Bash. As an exercise in perception, watch closely over the next few weeks to see how many of THE CORRECTOR's posts fall into this category. I think you'll be surprised at how pathetically repetitious her act is.
