Christ on a crutch! The next thing they're going to
ask for is the vote. Nag,nag,nag,nag. Can't a man have
some peace at all?

--- Ingegerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thank you. I have very strong feelings about this
> subject. It should 
> be a balance between the masculine and the feminine
> in every aspect 
> in society. And equal rights.
> Ingegerd 
> .
> --- In [email protected], "claudiouk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > I think this question about women in the Movement
> is very 
> > interesting - after all, a similar issue is about
> to split the 
> Church 
> > of England! Women in Catholicism & Islam also have
> an uphill 
> struggle 
> > for recognition against ossified culturally-
> determined "traditions". 
> > And yet "physiologically" the critical issue (for
> TMO)in terms of 
> > spirituality, is the "consciousness-supporting"
> physiology, 
> > not "sexual reproduction", which rests at a very
> superficial level 
> of 
> > reality. Even in terms of brain functioning,
> female brains are 
> > different, but actually are less "thing" and
> "action" dominated, as 
> > with males, and more "person" and "feeling"
> orientaded - so if 
> > anything, more "holistic" in character. Nothing
> here to suggest 
> that 
> > female spirituality would be any the less "real",
> "substantial" 
> etc. 
> > Personally, I have two daughters who are "gold
> standards" of 
> > spirituality, as far as I am concerned. It is
> amazing that one of 
> the 
> > motivating factors for suicide bombers, it seems,
> is the prospect 
> of 
> > enjoying 70-odd virgins in Paradise. What a crap
> Paradise this is - 
> > what if the virgins don't want this sexual
> encounter to happen? 
> What 
> > value is sexual satisfaction compared to the
> subline encounter with 
> > the transcendent? Ingegerd I am your supporter in
> this!
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As a woman, I think the attitude that MMY and
> his TMO have 
> towards 
> > > women, is dangerous, for women. For us, in the
> West, that have 
> > fought 
> > > for womens rights and is still fighting, it is
> like stepping back 
> > > centuries. Like we welcome the Taliban regime.
> Not in Burka, but 
> in 
> > > Saris. It is incredible that women from
> different countries don't 
> > > wear dresses from their own countries, but all
> dress in Saris in 
> > > Mother Divine - and International Courses and so
> on. It is like 
> an 
> > > uniform. In the Good Old Days MMY used to speak
> about variety, 
> and 
> > > how valuable variety is, to keep the Culture in
> our own Country. 
> To 
> > > value the Culture that we have in our own
> Countries. Because the 
> > > Natural Laws worked different in different
> countries. If you look 
> > at 
> > > the pictures from Global County, the variety is
> gone. 
> > > To really challenge the TMO. In the 60ths and
> 70ths, it was both 
> > men 
> > > and women running the TMO around the world, with
> success. Now it 
> is 
> > > only men...
> > > When I was initiating in The Soviet-Union some
> years ago, I was 
> > > working with Brahmans. When they met me, they
> had long serious 
> > > discussions about how to treat me, because I was
> from the West,I 
> > was 
> > > a woman and I was unmarried. Should they treat
> me as a Whore or 
> > > Madonna, because we were supposed to held
> courses together. I had 
> > all 
> > > the odds against me. At last they decided -
> Madonna. So I lived 
> > with 
> > > those guys at their premises, watching my step
> every hour in 6 
> > > months, happy to know that this was only a
> temporary situation. 
> > Now, 
> > > it seems that MMY and the TMO is making a
> lasting situation with 
> > the 
> > > women in the background, very humble and silent
> - it is just 
> > terrible.
> > > Ingegerd
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "L B
> Shriver" 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > --- In [email protected],
> "authfriend" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > --- In [email protected],
> off_world_beings 
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > <<(I'm kind of surprised nobody has talked
> about
> > > > > > this, not even the smattering of women
> here.
> > > > > > I didn't start thinking about it until
> just
> > > > > > recently. The only mention of the
> nonexistent
> > > > > > participation of women was when we noted
> the
> > > > > > original "Raja So-and-So and Wife" titles
> on
> > > > > > the photos of the couples, and the
> subsequent
> > > > > > removal even of this reference to the
> women.>>>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Everyone here is very blasie about this
> now, and it has 
> been 
> > > posted 
> > > > > > before.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Naw, I've been reading all the traffic here 
> > > > > from the beginning of the whole Raja thing,
> > > > > and I haven't seen a word except the
> comments
> > > > > about the wives not being named in the
> photos.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm not even talking about the *political*
> > > > > aspects; we've known about the TMO's, and
> > > > > MMY's, sexism for decades.  I'm talking
> about
> > > > > the practical effect of the absence of the
> > > > > feminine vibe among the Rajas in terms of
> > > > > whatever effect *they're* supposed to have
> on
> > > > > world consciousness.
> > > >  
> > > > ******
> > > > 
> > > > Your observations and question seem perfectly
> reasonable to me. 
> I 
> > > think the crux of the 
> > > > answer lies in your own words: "Â…whatever
> effect they're 
> supposed 
> > > to have on world 
> > > > consciousness".
> > > > 
> > > > Personally, I think there's not much to worry
> about in terms of 
> > the 
> > > movement's effects on 
> > > > world consciousness, because I don't see it
> having much of an 
> > > effect at this point.
> > > > 
> > > > [Not a trick question:] Do you see the
> movement having any 
> > > significant effect on world 
> > > > consciousness at the moment? If not at this
> time, 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to