Tex, you really are the champion of twisting words and ideas.....or more often 
just blatantly lying as you are here when you don't care for the message.

Who here has suggested that MMY only had sex for one year? No one.

On the contrary, the period involved appears to have been from the early 60s 
(according to Joyce-Collins Smith in the book "Call No Man Master") to roughly 
1975.

After 1975 there has been speculation over the last couple of days that either 
the effects of diabetes or some "coaching" from Jemmima Pittman might have 
ended his exploits.

Some, like Nabby, have suggested that MMY never claimed to be celibate, that 
his change in name from "Bal Bramachari Mahesh" to MMY was the clue.

I've been re-reading Nancy Cooke's book the last few days. I had forgotten the 
section where Charlie Lutes asks MMY about the stories of his indiscretions at 
Rishikesh in 1968. Charlie reports that MMY said: "But Charlie, I am a lifetime 
celibate, I don't know anything about sensual desires."

You really cannot deal with these stories of MMY's sexual life can you Tex. 
It's obvious they disturb you. I understand. They did the same to me back when 
I first heard them in Switzerland.

--- In [email protected], "WillyTex" <willy...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> yifuxero:
> > If some Tibetan Rinpoche's can do it, why not MMY?
> > 
> Well, maybe he could, but what would be the point?
> 
> Chogyam Trungpa was a tantric and drank alcoholic to
> excess, smoked cigarettes, and screwed everyone
> except his own wife. He did this since he was nineteen
> years old. Trungpa died from riotus living at an early 
> age. The Maharishi lived for thirty years longer than 
> Trungpa, but apparently the Maharishi didn't drink 
> any alcohol or smoke.
> 
> So, why would a guy like the Maharishi, who could
> have women at any time since 1956, who had been 
> celibate for sixty years, go off on a orgy of sex 
> with young women for one year, and then not engage in
> sexual relations for the next fifty years? 
> 
> It just doesn't compute because it's so out of 
> character.
>


Reply via email to