lurkernomore20002000 wrote: > Turq: > > And now Ravi's interview has quietly > >> been "disappeared" from the list, so as not to somehow >> cast questions upon the other interviews, and on the >> whole concept of "ordinary enlightenment." >> > > > Rick: > > I removed it. I think each interview stands on it's own, but if I were > one > >> of the people interviewed, I might feel uncomfortable about being >> > associated > >> with someone who was acting as Ravi has been. In light of Ravi's >> > behavior, I > >> didn't think it appropriate to post his interview, both for the >> > BatGap's > >> reputation and for Ravi's well-being. I don't think it's healthy for >> > him to > >> get any more attention or to have anything reinforce his notion that >> > he is a > >> guru. >> > > I didn't listen to the interview, so I have no idea of the content. > But, removing it for the reasons stated sounds a little "coddling", if > that's the right word. Coddling to Ravi, and coddling to those who > visit the site. So, what is the "reputation" of Batgap. And I say that > respectfully, because you have spent a lot of time and energy, and > probably money (although I am aware of your wife's requirement about > that). But how is the interview going to tarnish the reputation. > Thanks.
And especially now after the brouhaha more people probably want to see it. I know I do.
