--- In [email protected], "markmeredith2002" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ditto to the posts below -- MMY can do whatever he wants with his 
org.
> and I don't know anyone whining because they can't do other 
techniques
> in the dome, 


But your ARE still whining about it. My God.

> 
> Actually this was more of an issue for me in the past when not only
> other saints were viewed with fear and alarm, but also 
psychiatrists,
> marriage counselors, yoga teachers, non-ayurvedic MDs, and a whole
> host of other healers all under the principle "Maharishi has given 
us
> all we need to reach enlightenment" and "You can't trust the 
effects
> of practices not specifically approved by MMY". 

Whining , Whining,  Whining.

 Now it seems that
> taking medications or seeing therapists or normal MDs to deal with
> life's problems is not frowned upon as much as it used to be.  
Campus
> people still go to great lengths though to cover up their appts 
with
> healers and others who offer services that could be viewed as in
> competition with mmy ayurved or jyotish.


Whining , Whining,  Whining.
Off World

> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "Patrick Gillam"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > off_world_beings wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > ....anyone complaining that a few people can't 
> > > > go to the dome is childish and laughable. ... 
> > > > Maharishi doesn't want other pactices in the Dome  
> > > > and that is his choice. People should get over it
> > > 
> > > Oh, no question -- how Maharishi wants to run his 
> > > organization is his business. I'm not presuming to 
> > > tell him he should do this or that.
> > > 
> > > My pursuit of this and other topics stems from a 
> > > life-long interest in what's healthy and appropriate 
> > > behavior. Many times I've felt some action of mine 
> > > was justified -- some anger or indignation -- only 
> > > to learn I was deceiving myself.
> > > 
> > > Now, as you suggested I do, Off World, I'm examing 
> > > my belief that the purity of Maharishi's teaching 
> > > depends upon some behavior of mine. This discussion 
> > > is all about me. Maharishi has nothing to do with it.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your input.
> > 
> > In my case, since it's not likely I'll ever try to set foot
> > in a dome again in this incarnation, it's a matter of an
> > abiding interest in the ways that spiritual organizations
> > handle themselves, and what effects their different
> > behaviors seem to have on the progress of the members
> > of those organizations.  IMO, one of the least helpful and,
> > in fact, most detrimental, mindsets a spiritual organization
> > could possibly cultivate is elitism, a sense of self impor-
> > tance and exclusivity in its students.  Nothing seems to
> > stop spiritual progress in its tracks faster and more effec-
> > tively.  So I think it's kinda sad when I see it anywhere,
> > much less in an organization I still have some fond
> > memories of.  I guess that puts us on the same page,
> > with an interest in what's healthy and appropriate
> > behavior.
> > 
> > Unc





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to