Judy, if Barry gets to rail about me "projecting," and asserting that it must be my broken personality that does so, then, hey, goose/gander time, sez moi -- if Barry's "walk/talk law" is upheld then he's projecting HIS own criticism of himself.
Byron Katie time. Cue snare drum. And ain't it just the truest thing about him -- that he cannot be held to any talk if it requires him to walk it? Onliest walking he ever has done is away from his country, his gurus, his cultural values, his integrity, his sense of decency, his birth karma (ran away from the goal/challenge of being a life supporting American,) and let's not forget his familial roots. Edg --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > I have written before on the difference between talking > > the talk of one's spiritual path and walking the walk of > > it. And yes, as some have said, I have written about it > > enough that they claim to find it boring. I think that a > > larger reason than "boring" for the people saying this > > might be "I couldn't find a way to refute it the first > > time and I can't find one now, so I'm going to call it > > 'boring' in hopes that he'll stop saying it." :-) > > Actually, I called your raps (not just this one by any > means) "repetitious," not "boring." Interesting that > you felt you needed to escalate the criticism, but I > guess "repetitious" didn't work so well with your > fantasy about the "larger reason" for the criticism. > > The whole point of "repetitious," of course, is that > your trademark "raps" have been *repeatedly refuted*. > You keep bringing them back, in slightly different > clothing, in the hope that this time they'll pass > muster. > > Sorry, Charlie. The new outfit for the "rap" in > question suffers from the same poor workmanship in > its current iteration as all the other times you've > inflicted it on us. > > The question is, why on earth did you think you were > the only one aware of the difference between "talking > the talk and walking the walk"? It's a *cliche*, Barry. > It was a cliche long before you ever attempted to > preach it here. And it doesn't get any more original > or insightful with repetition. >
