When I knew the TMO they liked to throw all stray thoughts into a single simple 
waste bin and say that it is all unstressing, and this is where perhaps they 
are overlooking the other 50% of the energetic world, which includes in our 
case as humans a conscious organization of dark parasitic energy beings.
 
Instead of throwing all stray thoughts into the garbage bin I will provide a 
few categories here.
 
1)Some stray thoughts are the creation of our own active mind and creativity.
 
2)Some stray thoughts are not our own, but the thoughts of other people 
physically near to us, or people who are connected to us through knowledge, or 
even by pure random chance.  And likewise some stray thoughts are those of 
other awarnesses, like plants, animals, or any life-form.
 
3)Some stray thoughts are deliberately planted in our minds by parasitic shadow 
creatures without physical bodies, with the intention to direct us towards 
action or inaction which drain us of our most basic energy, that of attention, 
through wasteful senseless activities.
 
A careful study of the origins of these stray thoughts in meditation may lead 
over time to “seeing” the form of the energetic world composed of lines of 
attention.
 
Transcending and seeing the world for what it is without veils, even if it be 
temporary, makes one an important target for dark shadowy forces that 
intelligently and consciously keep most of the world under their domain. This 
is an organization of beings, intelligent bottom feeders of sorts, which feed 
off of the broadly scattered and wasted energy of the attention of common 
people.  They implant thoughts in all people to maintain these wasteful and 
misdirected activities.
 
The dark side is indispensable to the positive side and perfectly 
counterbalances it, and progress on the positive side cannot progress far 
without some understanding of one of the two most fundamental forces, the dark 
force, which I could describe in a series of equal terms such as; 
 
1) an infinite force of sadness, loneliness, melancholy, which is irreducible, 
beyond explanation, and forms the basis of all other human emotion and 
motivation (all other human emotions, including love, are just temporary 
islands floating upon and empowered by this basic reality); 
2) The destiny of an ever expanding universe, of universal dissolution; 
3)Freedom; 
4)Death.  
To understand this force one must find it within ones self, and grow to love 
and respect it as a component part of self.  One may also become aware of the 
beings that inhabit this other realm, and their motives.
 
I won’t elaborate on the light side too much here, except to say that it is the 
desire for life; structure; beauty; unification, all that Maharishi stuff 
basically.
 
A meditator which transcends, and perhaps occasionally “sees” the energetic 
world in relation to that pure transcendence is a prime target to these beings, 
and vulnerable if they are anything but a total saint, and I don’t believe that 
there really is such a thing as a saint, outside of the human desire to create 
legends.
 
Dark parasitic forces stalk us and try to find entry based on our routines and 
habits.  In my opinion there is no such thing as a good habit, such as 
meditation strictly twice a day at the same time each day.  These habits 
squelch the development of fluid intuition of what to do and when, that a 
transcending mind naturally develops.
 
On the other hand, and this is very important, most people will use this 
dissolution of so called “good” routines such as meditation, to forego it 
altogether, and that is perhaps worse, like throwing the baby out with the 
bathwater.  I meditate sort of on the average twice a day, and in various 
places, depending on calls from the “spirit”.  My meditations do have some 
amazing quality of calming down local noise and strife, beyond any logical 
explanation,... except for a certain insane explanation which would state that 
reality is basically dream-like, and where transcending touches the structuring 
property of that dream.
 
I see the structure of the TMO then as providing a sort of initial framework of 
security, such as nursery, but something which must also be transcended 
eventually for advancement.

--- On Mon, 6/28/10, authfriend <[email protected]> wrote:


From: authfriend <[email protected]>
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: No one starting TM or "Dome-ing"? Rewrite the 
sales brochure.
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, June 28, 2010, 10:25 PM


  



--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> 
wrote:
>
> I have written before on the difference between talking
> the talk of one's spiritual path and walking the walk of
> it. And yes, as some have said, I have written about it
> enough that they claim to find it boring. I think that a 
> larger reason than "boring" for the people saying this 
> might be "I couldn't find a way to refute it the first 
> time and I can't find one now, so I'm going to call it 
> 'boring' in hopes that he'll stop saying it." :-)

Actually, I called your raps (not just this one by any
means) "repetitious," not "boring." Interesting that
you felt you needed to escalate the criticism, but I
guess "repetitious" didn't work so well with your
fantasy about the "larger reason" for the criticism.

The whole point of "repetitious," of course, is that
your trademark "raps" have been *repeatedly refuted*.
You keep bringing them back, in slightly different
clothing, in the hope that this time they'll pass
muster.

Sorry, Charlie. The new outfit for the "rap" in 
question suffers from the same poor workmanship in
its current iteration as all the other times you've
inflicted it on us.

The question is, why on earth did you think you were
the only one aware of the difference between "talking
the talk and walking the walk"? It's a *cliche*, Barry.
It was a cliche long before you ever attempted to
preach it here. And it doesn't get any more original
or insightful with repetition.









      

Reply via email to