--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > [I wrote:] > > I could certainly be wrong, but I'm guessing he was very > > careful as to what he said about his sexual status, > > allowing folks to *assume* things that weren't the case > > without telling outright falsehoods. > > Not true. At Poland Spring (July 1970), in the midst of > MMY's "sexual phase" a guy named Michelangelo Salcedo got > up to the mic and told MMY he was interested in the sexual > revolution. MMY cut him short, saying that he was a monk, > it wasn't his field, and he didn't know anything about it.
That's not very convincing as an example of an outright falsehood, Rick. That MMY was having his own private sexual revolution didn't mean he knew anything about the sexual revolution in society that Salcedo was interested in. (Do you think Salcedo had heard rumors of MMY's sexual activities and was slyly hinting about them to see what MMY would say?)
