--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > <snip> > > Its this clinging to ones own view of what the word "real" means, > > and not seeing or acknowledging what the other may mean by the > > term, which is causing the war of words and abrasive feelings back > > and forth. > > That's part of it. As I noted in another post, > though, in the context of a TM forum, "real > levitation" is generally taken to mean objective, > physical, measurable levitation. So to use it in > a maybe-this, maybe-that sense, without being up > front about it right at the beginning, seems like > a sort of bait-and-switch attempt to mislead. > > <snip> > > A curious, perhaps side point here, is Unc's proposition that even > > if quite verifiable objective proof were presented, it would not > > change anyones mind. > > And yet he's quite insistent that it changed *his* > mind. Moreover, in the PDF file, the piece he > wrote says he was *prepared* to believe levitation > was possible because of the TM-Sidhis teaching. > > So "anyone" may not be the appropriate term here, > as far as Unc is concerned.
What Unc. is trying to express seems perfectly clear to me. If you choose to attack some his nuances as evidence of inconsistentcies (sp), then I'm afraid you may be choosing to throw out the whole case on the basis of an irrelevant technicality. lurk To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
