> > Your coming unglued in public isn't necessary and > > it isn't pretty either. > > Tom: > Actually, it's the crime against Nature, FFL, which > would get the axe for having copywrited material. > Not if it's posted for educational purposes, Tom, to show how a midget looks sitting next to a truck-size girl! Don't forget the 'fair-use' clause'.
So, I wonder who does own the copyright to the photo? It's not Judith because she was in the photo. She doesn't even list any photo credits in the book. Yes, I agree that it would be much more instructional if Judith had published a photo of herself naked on top of the midget guru, but that would hardly be revealing, except for the size of her huge ass, because nobody could see the midget underneath - I mean, it could have been Jerry under there or even Ms Pittman underneath! So, it's a good thing to see them sitting at the dinning room table doing it sitting up. That way, you can actually see just how big the truck girl is compared to the midget guru. > To think Willy did the deed! > Now you're getting really personal - I've never even met Ms Jemima Pittman. It's just too bad that Joe made such a fuss and tried to be the police, so now you'll have to buy the book for $37.00 to see the photo. You can blame Joe for that - all I was doing was trying to be helpful and give Judith's book a little free publicity, but Joe came unglued. Thanks, Joe, you really did a service to the FFL informants, you fukin' snitch! It makes you wonder though - Joe did you ever meet up with Judith or Conny at a TTC? Joe sure seems to be protective of Judith. Go figure. Judith says she was maybe at the Estes Park TTC, doing it in Maharishi's bedroom on at least one occasion when Ms Pittman wasn't peeping and looking in the bedroom door - but apparently Judith wasn't at the reunion, according to Rick. > > And I've got nothing against that truck- > > size girl, Judith. But why did she have > > to be so mean to Ms Pittman and Jerry? > >
