--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote:
>
> On 01/25/2011 01:51 PM, authfriend wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu<noozguru@>  wrote:
> > <snip>
> >> I read a report yesterday that only 47% of working age US
> >> workers have full time jobs!
> >
> > Somebody's playing with the statistics. Do you have a cite
> > of the report?
> >
> > They're likely counting folks who shouldn't be counted, such
> > as college students, those who've taken early retirement,
> > those who are independently wealthy, disabled people, etc.
> >
> > Of those who *want* to work, including those who have dropped
> > off the rolls because they're discouraged, the figure is
> > under 20% unemployed or underemployed.
> 
> Didya do a search?

Where do you think I got the under 20% figure?

> Anyway here is the blog that reported it based on the January
> 7th employment report.  Remember "full time jobs" are the
> operative words. There are a lot of people out there making
> ends meet by working two or three part time jobs.

True. I'd call them fully employed if they're making as
much as they would at a full-time job. Many people can't
get enough part-time work to amount to a full-time income.

> http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/2011/01/january-23-2011-only-47-of-working-age.html
> 
> They include the report link so you can play with the numbers 
> yourself to see if your mileage varies.

My mileage varies. In the first place, he lists 6.1%
unemployed as the official figure when it's actually
around 9.4%. In the second place, if you add up the
percentages for employed, unemployed, and part-time
employed for economic or noneconomic reasons, you get
75.7%; if you add his "not in the labor force" figure,
35.7%, you end up with over 111%. So something's
screwy just with his basic numbers.

Plus which, the "not in the labor force" category
includes many of the groups I listed above who aren't
in the market for a job, who wouldn't be working even
if the economy was roaring and millions of jobs were
going begging. So they're just not relevant.

We need to have a breakdown of that category into those
who would like a job but have given up hunting
(tentatively included in my 20% figure above) and those
who aren't in the market for a job.

We also need to know where the 3.3% he somehow left out
of the unemployment percentage went; and we need to
understand why his total percentage adds up to 111%.

> I always think the guvmint cooks the numbers to make
> things look better than they really are.

I'm sure it does. But this guy is cooking them to make
them look worse.

> Daily I hear a commercial with some gleeful announcer
> saying "now that the recovery is underway" and wonder
> what medical marijuana dispensary these people are 
> getting their smokes from.

I agree with you there.


Reply via email to