--- In [email protected], "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > This is the article in question: > > > > http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/12/13/101213fa_fact_lehrer > > > > It really doesn't suggest that Nature is pulling some > > kind of habituating woo-woo on us, or that science > > isn't tracking any more. Rather, science never *did* > > track as well as we thought, and we're just now coming > > around to realize it. > > > * * * Many thanks, Judy. Yes, that could well be so. FWIW I have noticed that > when we have on occasion used "woo-woo" by quickening our energy to shift the > Now, to support the deepest need, the past immediately aligns itself > accordingly to support that new Now. In other words, the shift almost always > seems entirely reasonable after the fact, so that the rational mind can > usually say, "this would have happened anyway, and we just didn't see it > until now," though just before the shift, such a "miracle" seemed utterly > impossible.
"We"? Who does this other than you?
