--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
<snip>
> I was interested in the term not for its description of the
> genetic abnormality found in Ashenazi Jews but for the
> description of the particular set of *behaviors* that 
> manifest as a result of the abnormality.   
> 
> The behaviors that were described in the texts I found
> when Vaj first mentioned the term revolved around 
> people of otherwise high intelligence who were kinda
> "borderline" with regard to arguing, especially about 
> the supposed meaning of words.  They were more likely
> to fly off the handle over word interpretations or misinter-
> pretations than other people, sometimes pathologically
> so.

Unfortunately, Barry is not telling the truth when
he suggests this "abnormality" has been shown to
produce the set of behaviors he describes.

Here is the *single sentence* Barry is relying on
above in the material about "Ashkenazi overclocking"
on the Web:

"But I'll hazard a guess: the change accelerates
some brain system tied to cognitive functioning - 
nearly redlines it, leaves it vulnerable to common
insults in a way that can cause spectacular
trouble."

This sentence--this "guess"--is what Barry means
by what he disingenuously calls the "texts" that
purportedly describe the "particular set of behaviors
that manifest as a result of this abnormality."

The original paper presenting the hypothesis about
"Ashkenazi overclocking" does not mention any such
behaviors.  None of the discussion on the Web
about it mentions any such behaviors, except for
that one speculative sentence, which just pops up
gratuitously out of the blue in the middle of some
otherwise technical material about genetics.

It's never followed up on or related to any of the
other discussion, by the person who made it or anyone
else commenting on the paper's thesis.

There's nothing wrong with Barry commenting on what
he perceives to be a "syndrome" of a particular kind
of behavior on electronic forums.  But for him to
associate it with the "Ashkenazi overclocking" thesis
as if this behavior were one of its findings, thereby
implying the linkage is scientifically based, is
dishonest in the extreme.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to