--- In [email protected], "seekliberation" <seekliberation@...> 
wrote:
>
> I assume it was a naive impulse simply because there seems
> to be this tendency to think that we are imprisoning these
> people for no reason at all.

Nobody thinks that.

> A lot of Americans don't seem to accept the fact that there
> really are people out there plotting to kill us, and
> succeeding at it sometimes.

Everybody accepts that there are such people.

I don't know where you come up with these wild ideas.

> When I say I don't know much about Gitmo, I'm only saying
> that I haven't done much research to look at the people
> imprisoned there and done any form of background check to
> confirm who, what, & why they are there.

Nobody disputes that there are bad guys among the
prisoners. But it's become quite clear that a good
many of them were innocent of any terrorist-type
activity to begin with. They've released quite a
few of those men, but there are still some left.

> But I do not distrust the decision to keep them there,
> nor do I look at congress and think they are stupid for
> having that prison in existence.

"Stupidity" isn't exactly the issue. The issues are
human rights, the Geneva Conventions, and the
Constitution, especially habeas corpus.

Guantanamo was established as the prison for "enemy
combatants" from Afghanistan and Iraq because it was
outside U.S. legal jurisdiction, meaning there were 
no restraints on how prisoners detained there could
be treated, including torturing them; and no legal
limits on how long they could be detained without
being charged, tried, and convicted.

Those who believe Guantanamo should be closed think
this is profoundly anti-American.

Another excellent reason for closing Guantanamo is
that the unlawful treatment of the detainees has
become a recruitment tool for terrorist groups. Plus
which, it is considered a terrible stain worldwide
on this country's reputation as a bastion of freedom
and democracy.

There is *zero* reason why the detainees cannot be
transferred to a high-security prison in the U.S.--
except that then we would have to observe the
Constitution and the Geneva Conventions in dealing
with them and prosecute them according to U.S. law
(as we've done very successfully with other
terrorists who weren't captured in Afghanistan or
Iraq).

It's a very complicated topic, but there's plenty of
information available. If you're at all interested in
the reasons for the controversy, I'd suggest you start
with the Wikipedia article and then follow up with
some of the sources it lists:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp


Reply via email to