turquoiseb:
> It was (and is) a few individuals who have opinions, 
> and state them publicly...
>
"A lawsuit was created in the Superior Court of California 
on January 6, 2005 (Case No. 05cc01931). But realizing that 
the exposure was high Rahm eventually refused to go to court. 
No other alleged victim came forward to testify in support 
of his allegations, though anti-Sai activists claimed there 
were many alleged US victims..."

Reply via email to