Agreed Judy, I was just musing at her *disobedience* (rejection) to tradition. I won't say it, I won't say it and you can't make me say it, so there!
________________________________ From: authfriend <jst...@panix.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 2:03:52 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Royal Wedding Notes --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@...> wrote: > > no, she just refused to say it. No, John's right, it's accepted nowasays. Has been for some time. Diana didn't promise to "obey" Charles either, back in 1981. It's the couple's choice. > ________________________________ > From: John <jr_esq@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 1:27:16 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Royal Wedding Notes > > Â > Apparently, as shown during the royal nuptial, it's accepted nowadays for the > bride to omit the vow of obeying her husband. > >http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_royals/20110429/wl_yblog_royals/prince-william-and-kate-middleton-now-officially-married >d >
