Yes, and not only that I've had software listed there.
gullible fool wrote: >Have you tried this site for shareware? >http://www.download.com/ > >--- Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>uns_tressor wrote: >> >> >> >>>--- In [email protected], >>> >>> >>"jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>--- In [email protected], Bhairitu >>>> >>>> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>Patrick Gillam wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Can anyone in the room recommend shareware I >>>>>>can use to manipulate PDFs and JPEGs? >>>>>>If you'd like to reply off-list to keep the >>>>>> >>>>>> >>clutter >> >> >>>>>>down, I'm sure everyone will appreciate it. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thank you kindly! >>>>>> >>>>>>- Patrick Gillam >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>There are printer drivers that output to PDF >>>>> >>>>> >>files instead of a >> >> >>>>>printer. That way you can use almost any >>>>> >>>>> >>graphics or >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>wordprocessor to >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>create PDFs. These are far less expensive than >>>>> >>>>> >>buying Acrobat >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>(I paid >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>$25 for one). In some more recent programs may >>>>> >>>>> >>be able to export >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>to >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>PDF. Just do some searches. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks for "staying legal." Software development >>>>>of today's products takes large teams composed of >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>specialists in their field and somebody has to >>>>> >>>>> >>pay >> >> >>>>>for that. Without the income the software >>>>>won't exist. >>>>> >>>>>- Bhairitu >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>Ever heard of Linux? Historians will have two >>> >>> >>observations >> >> >>>on 20th Century IT. The first is that someone made >>> >>> >>67 >> >> >>>thousand millions of pounds selling faulty goods >>> >>> >>and the >> >> >>>other is that so many people put up with it. >>>Don't bleed for fat cats that cause problems for >>> >>> >>others >> >> >>>by not accepting responsibility for their goods >>>Uns. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Uns, you have a short memory ;-) I mentioned a >>while back I am using >>Linux in fact right now on Knoppix with Thunderbird >>as my email >>client. I very much think that for operating >>systems open source is the >>way to go. Microsoft is a Frankenstein monster >>unleashed on the world >>by circumstance. It needs to be broken up into >>about 100 companies (or >>maybe 1000). Even Bill Gates said in the early >>1990s it might be better >>broken up into 3 companies. But he never did it. I >>would even bet that >>right now there is a Microsoft Linux group in >>Redmond. :) >> >>Open Source for apps can be good too especially if >>it's a niche market >>item where the customers who would be interested >>don't have the income >>to purchase it. However we often have to wait for a >>complete product >>from open source folks and if the folks driving the >>development get >>bored or get offered a good job (because someone >>noticed their work on >>the project) then the project falters. >> >>Pricing commercial software can be high voodoo too. >>You need to make a >>profit to survive and you need to cover your >>development expenses. Even >>then it is a crap shoot. Price it too high and >>your customers won't >>buy it and price it too low and folks won't think >>it's worth anything. >>Hmm.... reminds me of something else. ;-) >> >>As for bugs, your tester usually miss something that >>shows up as soon as >>you release. Therefore all first releases should be >>considered betas >>unless the program is really simple. Open betas >>help with the process >>but for some products won't be practical. And bugs >>aren't limited to >>just software. Your computer, your TV, your DVD >>player, camcorder, >>digital camera, game console, etc. all ship with >>bugs which required >>workarounds. Believe me, just because the product >>has a big company >>name on it doesn't mean the code is any better. >>Often there is a >>distance between the desires of the suits that run >>the company (who are >>often clueless about how software and hardware is >>developed) and the >>realities of the development team. >> >>- the Geek Tantrik >> >> >> >> >>To subscribe, send a message to: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Or go to: >>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ >>and click 'Join This Group!' >>Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > > >To subscribe, send a message to: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Or go to: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ >and click 'Join This Group!' >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
