On May 26, 2011, at 7:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote: As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were alleged to have taken place.
Is that anything like Christian groups who go to Israel and speak with people there who assure them that Mary was a virgin? Richard says he spoke directly with the lawyer who handled SBS's will, And SBS died over 50 years ago, right? And the "lawyer who handled" his will is still alive and kicking, eh? And still remembers various details? Right. and traveled to some of various places at issue and spoke with people who were contempories of SBS, and M. And of course all these contemporaries are still alive as well. Vaj's sources seem 2 or 3 steps removed from the events they are commenting on, and are never identified in any detail. Usually they are "a student of so and so" That's called opinion~~why is that so threatening? Sal
