--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > That's an interesting analysis. > > > Everyone knows that the 2 most fanatic critics of Maharishi and the TMO, Turq and Vaj are both so-called Buddhists, which is hardly a coincidence. > > > > > > > Intolerance of other religions and POVs is not the hallmark of spirituality that I aspire to or seek. > > > Who's talking about intolerance ? It's simply obvious that the two most vile critics of Maharishi are Buddhists and some speculate whether or not this is a coincidance. That's all. >
Definitely not intolerance, it shows the spiritual depth of the people attracted to Buddhism. People like Tart, Vaj and Barry have trouble with the paradox of a real Guru like MMY however are very comfortable with the consistency of a pseudo-spiritualist like Dalai Lama. Their egos are not disturbed, their imperfections are never addressed instead it results in ideals of world peace or fascination for political revolutions. These retards get attracted by equally retarded fake spiritualists like Gandhi, Lama & MLK with their consistent values of non-violence, peace, compassion or whatever rocks their boat. A real Guru OTOH never cares for outer imperfections, he or she only cares for the inner revolution. Perfection is never possible in the outer, perfection in the inner is merely the acceptance of an imperfectly perfect world. Retards like Tart, Vaj and Barry who project their perfections on the Guru are sorely disappointed and spend their rest of lives denouncing Gurus, moving to Holland, condemning US, supporting terrorist causes in the name of peace, or promoting political revolutions in countries such as Egypt and being fascinated with Buddhism and Dalai Lama.
