Two quick points, then I'll get back to this tomorrow. --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: <snip> > You are trying to take the reporter's take on my > description to mean that somehow I was off track and > different from all the other fulltime people with my > level of experience in the movement.
I was most certainly *not* trying to do that. Don't be ridiculous. > What I am criticizing Jim for is trying to criticize me > both ways, for being too into it all and now not enough. > It is an unfair double bind not based on actually knowing > me then or now. I am defending myself from his unfair > criticism which you are supporting. I don't think you ever got the point Jim was making. I support *his* point, not your straw-man version of it. More tomorrow.
