--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Yifu" <yifuxero@...> wrote: > > Like I said, if somebody (say any Krishna Bhaktis of various stripes - the > Hare Krishna Guru, Swami Prakashanand, the fellow below...etc) claims Krishna > is the "Supreme Personality of Godhead", apart from Scriptures, what's the > evidence? The Guru below appears to be more "liberal" than the Fundie > Bhakti's since he's saying there's a certain legitimacy in accepting the > impersonal Absolute in terms of Realization, along with Bhakti. Fine...even > Ramana Maharshi was a devotee of Shiva and Ramakrishna was a devotee of Kali. > ... > However, under the cover of Absoluteness, he appears to be sneaking in a form > of "Godhead" Personality worship; even though he's provided no evidence that > Krishna is superior to YHVH or the Scientology God Xenu. Again, there's no > evidence that one or the other of these "gods" is the "Supreme Personality of > Godhead". > ... > The Guru below is a Wolf in Sheep's clothing - trying to sneak in Hare > Krishna Fundamentalism in to the field under the cover of Brahman > Realization. It's a Trojan Horse. Don't fall for it. > ... > Either there is a "Supreme Personality of the Godhead" or there is not. But > should any Entity make such a claim, I would spit in His face. Goddesses such > as Kali and Durga are sugar and spice. The male "gods": Krishna, YHVH, > Ram,...appear to be self-worshipping abusers high on testosterone rather than > Soma.
Rick Archer even interviewed Igal Harmelin, why not another nobody ?
