Sorry it's kind of lame, but below are my responses to this hilarious post. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: > > > > Now *this* is the quality of "call and response" I > > miss on Fairfield Life. > > Good, now you have an example of how to do it. > LOL.. > > Rick had every opportunity to overreact to this > > post, and to get all defensive or even abrasive > > in his response. > > Actually, most people will respond this way to a > post that doesn't try to put them down. You should > try it sometime. > > (Hint: The post I'm responding to isn't an example.) > LOL.. > > And yet that didn't happen. > > The fact that it didn't speaks IMO to the concept > > of "spiritual maturity" on both sides of the > > conversation. > > It speaks to the concept of respectful disagreement > (and there wasn't even that much disagreement). > > > Would that this level of exchange were more common. > > You could arrange for it to be significantly more > common if you'd engage in it yourself. >
LOL..
