--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > -- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > Great response, thanks for an excellent read of thoughtful points! > > > > Says curtis, who missed the fact that Maharishi left the title "Bal > > Brahmachary" already in the '50s. Yet curtis goes on and on about sex. > > > > Deep in his heart he is just a hillbilly-whiner. > > Can't thank you enough for this opportunity Nabbie! > > Lets break it down shall we? > > In Maharishi's system there were two states of life, Brahmachary which he > equated with a monks or renunciate lifestyle. > > The other way was the householder lifestyle. > > In one you get to use your dick in the context of married life. > > In the other you don't. > > Although Maharishi didn't go around calling himself Bal Brahmachari Maharishi > Mahesh Fredrico, Jesus Fernando Yogi, he did refer to himself as being a > monk, or a renunciate many many times, sometimes in my presence personally. > It went along with his "I have no pockets" routine when pressed about > finances.
I also heard him asked the question directly, and he answered (surprising himself it appeared) that he would have to call himself a householder, because he lived in the world and controlled a large organization (or words to that effect). Lawson
