--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > "A dualistic explaination to satisfy a mind stuck in duality. Let > > > me think about it some. Something is only stressful when it overshadows > > > being. How can the ocean be compressed into a drop... it's a > circular argument it doesn't compute ..." > > > > > > JohnY > > > > > > The ocean can be in the drop but does the drop explain the nature > > of the ocean? > > Does the analogy hold at this point?
Someone spoke of true/false analogies a couple of weeks ago. There is a set of rules for an analogy which define whether it is likely to be good or not. They go back to Ancient Greece. Does anyone know them? Uns. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
