I believe you are mistaking your own musical taste for an assessment of talent. Not the first time either.
Her talent is in expressing feelings so her audience is moved to feel them too. Her tools are apparently up to the task. Not all musicians are entertainers. She is an entertainer who happens to be a musician. But you are not her target audience. So it doesn't work for you. Learning how to appreciate forms of music that lie outside our usual preference, to see something in what her fans see, leads to a more open mind and greater acceptance of people who are different from us. And this happens to be her mission as an artist. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > On 06/24/2011 04:15 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-210ELLl7Y&feature=related > > > > Let's see, this is a jazz group and Lady Gaga is performance art. Lady > > Gaga is parodying pop music so don't take her seriously. She has a > > serious music background so the little musical ditties she writes as if > > they were song for Cher to sing are a piece of cake for her to write. > > The imagery and art is probably the harder part. And so much of the > > choreography is Bollywood instead of Hollywood. > > > That's alright. Problem is that she can't sing in a convincing way, nor can > she dance and the music is what ? Dilletante at best. What we are left with > is costumes. > > It was sad to read that this fellow, claiming to have been (!) in Unity, as > if Unity can be swiched on and off, elevated this amateur to some kind of > goddess. > > My aim was simply to point to the fact that there are real artists out there > receiving 0 attention, making 0 money. > > The wannaby "enlightened" needs a checking. >
