Hmm! If it's OK with you, Dan, I really wouldn't want to label either mirror; that's the beautiful thing about a mirror (and the reality it symbolizes) -- it simply says Yes to whatever we place in front of it, and it reflects it beautifully, but that's not what it IS.
I cannot say I even believe there really are such things as "Absolute" and "Relative" -- there only is That-which-IS, or only is US, and the ideas we superimpose on That US. On the other hand, if you enjoy making a (different) distinction, who am I to interfere? :-) --- In [email protected], "danfriedman2002" <danfriedman2002@...> wrote: > > > I think your mirrir is named Absolute and mine Relative. This takes us back > to my initial comment: ¨We are all One but Different¨. My experiences > (outside Transcendence) are filtered through those differences. > > We´ll meet someday. > --- In [email protected], "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "danfriedman2002" <danfriedman2002@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Now I believe that you´ve got it TWICE! > > > > Ha! I appreciate your appreciation, Dan -- perhaps "it takes one to know > > one" TWICE! > > > > And hey, why stop there? Two mirrors placed opposite each other will > > multiply the reflection into infinity! :-) > > >
