--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002" <danfriedman2002@...> wrote: > > feste37, > > Thank you for shedding light on this. I just posted my Reply to Turq, in > which I corrected his paraphrasing of my words. > > As you can imaging, I am eager to get Turq to control himself, and stop it. > > The origional Turq Attack contained hiw description of pissing on me, in > front of his fans. I understood that to be Turq's invitation to a pissing > contest, which I contine to decline. Turq seems to provoke others to piss and > shit all over him, but I won't oblige. That disappoints him, so he continues > his ugly provocations. Meybe he can conto; himself. Or maybe not. We'll see > if he just stops. >
Dream on, Dan. Expect a rant from Barry in which he indulges his afflictive emotions and mocks you for asking him to stop being a jerk. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You're wrong on that, actually. Dan began posting here before that, only to > > be attacked by you for no reason at all after just one or two inoffensive > > posts. You mocked and ridiculed him. You tend to do this when any new > > person appears here. Are you aware of this rather unpleasant behavior on > > your part? > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002" > > > <danfriedman2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the background. I too was shocked to find > > > > that a FFL Member had Googled my wife and reported the > > > > results back to FFL. > > > > > > Ahem. > > > > > > It may be good to roll back time machine and remind > > > folks that *Dan* was the person who started his posting > > > career at FFL by trying to get Rick and others to reveal > > > to him the names of anonymous posters whose opinions he > > > didn't like. But when Alex does what any Internet user > > > can do and looks up the real name associated with his > > > wife's email ID, he's "shocked." Not only a drama queen, > > > but a hypocrite. > > > > > > 5/20/2008: > > > > FFL seems to be a mixed place. I think I'll be > > > > doing my sharing in the real world, where I can > > > > see who's speaking. > > > > > > 5/21/2008: > > > > Can you let me know your town. > > > > > > 5/23/2008: > > > > You repeadedly request that "I live in the real > > > > world", yet never respond to my request that > > > > you provide your whereabouts. > > > > > > 5/23/2008: > > > > You still display those big balls. Why won't you > > > > let us know where you are. > > > > > > 1/20/2011 (after Rick forwards an anonymous post): > > > > Rick, I am following this post with interest. When > > > > you posted this, did you understand that you were > > > > shilling for an anonymous poster, who's written a > > > > letter that's hateful, but isn't standing behind it? > > > > Did you read the innuendo? Did you see the self > > > > promotion of the author? What did you see here? > > > > In my opinion it's a nasty letter. Who is the author? > > > > > > 1/20/2011: > > > > The author himself refers to his "cynical tirade", > > > > so I guess he or she didn't write what you call > > > > "some valuable observations in a humorous, ironic way." > > > > Why post it without identifying the source? I'd like > > > > to know who is posting a cynical tirade when I read one. > > > > > > 1/20/2011: > > > > For clarification: I attempted to have an author > > > > associated with the post. Probably a good idea for > > > > all posts to have attribution, so there is not an an > > > > annonymous rash of posts. > > > > > > 1/20/2011: > > > > in my opinion, the annonymous post defames a group. > > > > > > 1/20/2011: > > > > I live in a world where anonymous letters defaming > > > > groups exists. I am trying to change those acts that > > > > I come across > > > > > > 1/20/2011: > > > > Who said anything about the ANONYMOUS WRITER > > > > defaming me? He's defaming gurus anonymously. > > > > > > 1/20/2011: > > > > As I've repeatedly written, I believe that attack > > > > letters should name the attacker. > > > > > > 1/21/2011: > > > > A secret ballot, or protecting the freedom of the > > > > press, is a far cry from hurling insults or accusations > > > > anonymously and your grievance is endorsed by the > > > > moderator. Not every request for authorship is an > > > > attack on Democracy. > > > > > > 1/22/2011: > > > > I think it is reasonable to have a name associated with > > > > the defamation of any group. In this case I am shocked > > > > to see a Group Moderator do the posting, repeatedly > > > > support the anonymity, and provide his endorsement by > > > > affixing a subject line which reads: "Wise thoughts > > > > from a psychologist". > > > > > > ...etc. > > > > > >
