Curtis, In reply to your first paragraph: You are not "seconding the motion", but rather introducing your own "motion", as your charactarization of my suggestion as "outing of people against their will" is incorrect.
Your other 4 paragraphs devolve further. I interpret them to be support for your critisism of my suggestion, which you mischaracterized anyway (see above). --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > Hey Rick, > > I just want to second the motion for more restrictions on posters here and > more outing of people against their will. Our need to know who is posting is > much more important than their privacy. > > Also I would like to see a lot less of posters using passive construction in > their writing. We need MORE action verbs, not less. Any chance you can > include that demand in your new rules? > > And (last thing) how about a total ban on anyone referring to Guru Dev as > "that homeless guy who hit the lottery." It is offensive to dwelling > impaired Americans. > > Oh yeah (seriously, last thing) and I'm getting a little sick of the phrase > UFO when we know damn well who these aliens are and where they are from. (I'm > talking to you El Salvador) > > Oops (I promise last last last) If you wouldn't mind, I would like to see a > shot of female posters in a wet T-shirt. Not to be sexist but in the spirit > of the fullest possible dis-clothes-her. > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 > > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:55 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's Sandals > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected] > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "danfriedman2002" > > <danfriedman2002@> wrote: > > > > > > This is now the second instance where the facts provided by this > > non-Member are questioned. > > > > > > Rick, wouldn't it just make more sense to provide attribution? Do your > > Sources need to be protected? > > > > > > More transparency, please. > > > > You must be joking ! Rick's motto is the wilder the rumor the better, at > > least if it aims at a saint. > > No transparency please ! > > > > So says Nabby, whose real name none of us know, and who delights in stories > > of UFOs (which I happen to believe in myself), mysterious world saviors, > > etc. > > >
