-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > You know, she still does have quite a pretty face. Her > sisters? Not so much. I guess her claim to fame is her > sex tape. I haven't seen, but evidently that is what > she is famous for.
This is one of those situations that is amusing for me because living where I live and seeing US trends only on the Internet, I have no idea who the "she" in question is. I know the name and have a vague impression of what her face looks like from sidebar stories on HuffPost and other "news" forums, but I have never been tempted to click on any of them. I get the impression "she" has sisters and that the world is somewhat fascinated by her. For all I know she may be some famous actress whose B movies I have somehow missed, but the impression I get that she's one of those people who are famous for being famous. Few, if asked, could ever come up with a reason *why* such people are famous, but famous they are. Go figure. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Plastic surgery? : ) > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > wrote: > > > > > > one go from having such an fresh and innocent face to becoming such > an example of excess. (at least IMHO) > > > > > > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2029222/Kim-Kardashian-Kris\ > -Humphries-pictures-Before-famous.html > > > > > >
