So you claim to read devanagari texts. We can therefore submit passages which you will translate to demonstrate your skills. Right?
We've already gone over the variants of ing/.m which Svarupananda chooses not to acknowledge. Your statement is just barking ... woof woof. BTW ... who is your guru/sampradaya and what is your date and place of learning TM. Do you even claim to have learned TM? O yeah, one more thing. I never was a neo-nazi and don't know much about them. My predecessor was an altgenazim, which is not, however, to be confused with an ashkenazim. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Nov 10, 2011, at 2:16 PM, emptybill wrote: > > > Vag is no Sanskrit reader. > > This is where he gets this stuff ... > > > No it's not where I get my materials. I own copies of both the > original texts and the translations. I've been reading Sanskrit texts > since I was 15 years old... > > For the Shankaracharya tradition POV, I would rely on Brahmananda's > successor who states: the mantras are being pronounced wrong and "six > eared". Perhaps this is why TMers go into "demonic states of > consciousness'? >
