--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Got it- the googling was instaneously helpful, though I > > > have > > > > > to > > > > > > > say > > > > > > > > now that I don't know what all the fuss is about, > > > > particularly > > > > > > > > visualizing these "higher" states. In all honesty, they > > > look > > > > > > > almost > > > > > > > > pathetic... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to clarify, it is not the experience of the states I was > > > > > observing > > > > > > > as pathetic, rather, their symbolic representation on the > > > > > backdrop > > > > > > > of Brahman seems so tiny. When I saw the forms I was > > > like,"you > > > > > mean > > > > > > > that's *all* I get, for these "higher" SoC's??" > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes *lol* > > > > > > > > > > So, given that the double cone is an incorporation of all > time- > > > > > space, past, present, and future, emanating from a > > singularity, > > > > what > > > > > does the other, 'negative space' double cone, seen > > > perpendicularly > > > > > to the first double cone, formed from the first cone's > > > boundaries, > > > > > represent? > > > > > > > > > > Or is that other 'negative space' double cone just a fragment > > > > > created from the limitations of using the first double cone > as > > > > > symbolic of Brahman? > > > > > > > > Good question! I would say offhand that the double cone is > > actually > > > > the central core of a torus (the Hiranyagarbha-field), which in > > > turn > > > > is one of the countless "Krishna-bubbles" or Universes, and so > > > > on...:-) > > > > > > > > The play of the three gunas is clearer when we see it as a full- > > > > fledged torus rather than as merely the central core. > > > > > > For MMY, the Veda's torus has 10 dimensions. > > > > That's nice. I have generally preferred a matrix of 12 (13) or 16 > > (17) myself :-) > > Why those specifically?
On the physical plane, any given sphere contains 13 smaller close- packed spheres of equal size: 12 arranged in a Cuboctahedron or Vector-equilibrium-matrix pattern around a central 13th: Brahma/Aditi and His/Her 12 rays or Adityas. (Aligning these with the zodiacal 12, we may also find four more sensitive points at the solstices and equinoxes.) These 13 (or 17) pair up and align along the spine to form nine major chakras, or dimension-gates, in a given "body". Perhaps these align one way or another with MMY's 10 dimensions; I don't know, and don't have much curiosity about it ATM. While this system has tremendous potential for awakening and connecting subtle energies, from another angle it's all just another self-portrait or fairy-tale, anyhow :-) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
