--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: <snip> > > The thing that causes me to believe in this theory > > is the fact that RWC refuses to even consider it, > > even as a possibility. *His* subjective view is the > > only possible explanation. That's pretty much classic > > NPD/hypomania. > > Of course.
"Of course"?? Really? Because NPD/hypomanic people believe their subjective view is the only possible explanation, and Robin believes his view is the only possible explanation, therefore Robin must be NPD/hypomanic? You *buy* that? (BTW, Robin's said a number of times that he could be wrong about everything. He's also said he came here to test out his ideas and get feedback, hardly the approach of a person who refuses to consider anything but his own views. So we can cross that off the list as a basis for diagnosing him as NPD/hypomanic even without taking into account the illogic of Barry's attempt.) > He is smart enough, he makes everyone either follower (or > admirer) or opponent. (black and white, ask Curtis) In > reality he is a poor and old guy, who's illusions were > shattered. I don't really find any mystery about him, I > rather find the fascination mysterious, he has for some > people, intelligent people at that. You sure have written enough about this "poor and old guy" in recent weeks. You've even done parodies of his writing style. Sort of strange considering you find him so uninteresting. Something's not quite adding up here. One of the things about Robin *I* find interesting is how he evokes reactions, positive OR negative, from so many of us. Since December 1, there's been an average of more than 20 posts *per day* to or about Robin (not including his own posts), not all from his fans by any means (34 of them, in fact, have been yours; 41 have been from Vaj).
