--- In [email protected], Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > <snip> > "Then Judy joined in as if his tirade were just another cute thing the pool > boy does as he cleans her pool as she sips vodka enhanced ice tea lemonades > enjoying the view. Kiss kiss Ravi, you are so hot! See how it works Ravi, she > would be buying YOU drinks in a bar, does it all make sense now why the hot > young thing slipped out the back door while you found out the number she gave > you was fake?" > > > Curtis, I believe you've taken this out of context. Â I was teasing Ravi > about his cute photo (IMO) and mentioned in my post that Obba or Judy might > give him a "kiss-kiss" as there was also a short string of tease posts that > had already happened where Obba had used that term. Â Judy was likely just > playing on my post and replying in the affirmative around the pic only. > Â This was my post. Â
I don't believe I am misquoting Judy, but if I am I'm sure she will correct it. And I was not trying to criticize you in any of this. We all are welcome to our own view of the guy and how he relates to us has a lot to do with that. I'm happy for him to find people to relate to here and if the Ravi ride is your cup of tea it is none of my business. > > > "Ravi, wait, I forgot to emphasize...this picture of you IS "HOT" - try and > stay objective in your review :)  I'm sure that Obba would give you a wet > KISS KISS on this one.  Judy might pile on with a "kiss-kiss" if you are > really lucky.  If Bob wasn't vacationing somewhere on a remote romantic > island with "the wife", he could probably send you the appropriate movie clip > to seal the deal.  Now, for me the word "hot" is a new one, so I'm using my > intuition on this one." > > > > ________________________________ > From: curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltablues@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 8:41 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Happy new year to everyone !!! (And more love > bombing..) > > > > -- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > Snipped the dancing routine, sooo Nancy Grace in the groaning 3 inch > heels.  But this is the good part cuz her refusal to accept that she has > been called out was just predictable. > > Here is where I start hearing the music from the start of the twilight zone > in my head. > > > It's amazing how Curtis engineered all this to make > > himself appear to be the totally blameless victim by a > > series of moves that's so convoluted nobody gets what > > he's done except those he's done it *to*. And not for > > the first time, either. > > > > That's one thing at which he's better than anyone here. > > And this is not the first time you have accused me of such a bizarre > thing.  And on a public board no less where we all read all the posts if we > want to.  And I am able to hide my deviousness from everyone but Judy, how > can that be?  Oh I know, it has to do with her inflated sense of her > perceptive powers to detect evil, beyond all other posters reading the same > posts. > > Let me defend myself from this twisted claim of special powers of deceit in > plan sight. > > Ravi was spinning a tale of how he has no sexual desire from his self > proclaimed "whatever" state for the umpteenth time, while describing the old > guy in the club behavior I get to see on a regular basis during performances > where alcohol is served.  The only people I hear talking about having no > sexual desire uninvited, and relevant to nothing that applies to us, are > preachers running a "I'm too special for human feelings" like Jerry > Falwell.  In the end they are usually revealed to be hypocrites who were > compelled to make their denials because they are selling a story about > themselves.  Like Ravi is. And I would have just let it pass but he also > called me dishonest for the millionth time with zero evidence. So I commented > on how he appeared to me. > > Then Ravi claimed that he wasn't really buying drinks for an underage girl > which was his original story.  I am guessing that he ended up looking a bit > loseresque getting worked by a Tom Sawyer in hot pants and a tank top.  So > he tried to cover his tracks but once I smelled a rat I didn't buy his > denial. I think he really did go to a club and have a young girl work him for > free drinks before telling him she needed to go to the bathroom and run out > of the club giggling with her friends full of Ravi financed liquor.  So he > flew off the handle and called me names, some of which are out of line so I > let him know I felt that way.  I tried to explain to him the deeper context > of his slurs and how they really don't belong here.  Labeling someone's > behavior as desperate or his denials of having human feelings like the rest > of us is not the same thing as being called a retard, (the N word of the > disabled community) or an unhinged assault being called > someone's bitch, which among men is rarely used face to face because it is > an invitation to fight. Online it is extreme trollish behavior.  Then he > doubled down again and lied about why I left the movement. > > Then Judy joined in as if his tirade were just another cute thing the pool > boy does as he cleans her pool as she sips vodka enhanced ice tea lemonades > enjoying the view.  Kiss kiss Ravi, you are so hot!  See how it works > Ravi, she would be buying YOU drinks in a bar, does it all make sense now why > the hot young thing slipped out the back door while you found out the number > she gave you was fake? > > I was reminded of her posturing against what she considered unfair posts and > how she castigated me for not stepping in to scold other posters who attack > her.  I remember the rash of shit she has flung my way concerning me not > busyboding myself about what other people say to her.  I realized that she > was really in the exact situation where if she has an ounce of the integrity > and ethical values she bloviates around here like it is her special badge of > honor, she would say in her I love hot Ravi manor, "hey Ravi, perhaps you > could turn it down a notch, some of us read here."  But no. > > And I frankly don't care if she didn't, and don't need her to come to my aid > for a mouthy dude who calls other men names while out of their reach.  But > I notice the hypocrisy and I called her on it and asking her to get off my > case for doing the exact same thing, choosing my battles here, and letting us > fight our own. And without the rash of hypocritical shit, that would be a > reasonable position that I endorse here. > > But then she chose to enter the Twilight Zone to try to slip out of getting > called on bullshit.  It was me who made Ravi use derogatory terms for > mentally disabled people, lie about why I left the movement, and lay into a > demeaning tirade. > > One that other posters noticed was over the trollish line. > > But not Judy.  Judy saw secret Curtis deviousness at work orchestrating > Ravi's bad behavior from his secret lair.  And that defending myself from > an unwarranted meltdown attack is because I've been fighting a computer virus > and it has unhinged me. > > And only she can see it, but all you other dimwits who read these posts are > unable to penetrate my devious ways. > > Out of all of this I am looking forward to a 2012 with zero "you need to > scold other people for things they say to me" posts. > > Zero. > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > I still am waiting to hear from you:  do you think > > > > > > > > > > it is ok for Ravi to have told that nasty personal > > > > > > > > > > lie about Curtis? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See if you can rephrase your question so it's not > > > > > > > > > offensive and I'll consider answering it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you think it is ok for Ravi to have told that > > > > > > > > particular lie about Curtis's leaving the TM movement? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's see, "Does Judy think it's OK to tell lies?" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope, still offensive. > > > > > > > > > > > > Uh, I asked if you think it is ok if Ravi told a Particular > > > > > > lie in a Particular instance?  Not a general statement about > > > > > > how you feel about lying in general (Does Judy think it is OK > > > > > > to tell lies?). > > > > > > > > > > So you're unsure of whether a negative response to "Does > > > > > Judy think it's OK to tell lies?" would cover all lies. > > > > > > > > > > I see. > > > > > > > > > > > A bit of difference, as you well know and would be quite > > > > > > quick to point out in others. > > > > > > > > > > Not if I were paying attention and wanted to be fair. > > > > > > > > > > > But in your dodging around and unwillingness to answer > > > > > > I got my answer. > > > > > > > > > > You can manufacture whatever answers and degree of > > > > > willingness suit your agenda, Susan. They don't have to > > > > > have anything to do with reality. > > > > > > > > Hey, whatever.  I don't want to hide behind analysis of > > > > details and words.  Just simple responses would have been > > > > enough for me.  I am done with this discussion, no interest left. > > > > > > If one reads the words carefully, Judy is correct to not > > > wishing to answer the questions as they were written. It > > > was spin. Who wants to answer spin? > > > > Not only was it spin, the whole basis for the question was > > disingenuous, since Susan is well aware I'm against lying. > > But she wanted to hide behind the pretense that there was > > some uncertainty on that point. > > > > There were any number of questions she *could* have asked > > that would have cleared up what she genuinely didn't > > understand. Even if she didn't agree, at least she would > > have known what she was disagreeing *with*. > > > > It's amazing how Curtis engineered all this to make > > himself appear to be the totally blameless victim by a > > series of moves that's so convoluted nobody gets what > > he's done except those he's done it *to*. And not for > > the first time, either. > > > > That's one thing at which he's better than anyone here. > > > > > > > > > > Just saying. > > > Happy New Year to us all! > > > > > > > >  >
