--- In [email protected], zarzari_786 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed > > > out an unintended irony, a lie or a wiggle from owning > > > up to an error because and only because the person she > > > confronted is a TM critic. Bet you a buck you can't and > > > I'll bet you another buck Judy would be the first to dig > > > up such a post if it existed. > > > > Raunchy, I think that what zarzari and others > > have perceived (and rightly, IMO) is that the > > *particular* nitpicks that Judy comes up with > > to criticize someone very often have nothing > > whatsoever to do with her real reasons *for* > > criticizing them. > > > > One of the troika will post something less > > than worshipful about Maharishi or TM or TMers > > and within a few hours Judy will be all over > > that person *for some unrelated, made-up reason*. > > > > It's like a teacher who only criticizes the > > black students in the class. The individual > > criticisms may actually be valid. But if a > > case can be made that the *vast majority* of > > the criticisms are of black students, and in > > fact the *vast majority* of things that teacher > > says *period* are negative comments about the > > black students, that teacher is going to get > > fired for being a racist. > > > > Judy has been trying to "get" the same three > > people on this forum for well over a decade > > now, one for over 17 years. I think it's > > justified to question whether the reasons > > she comes up with *for* consistently trying > > to "get" them are her real reasons, or > > whether that's just the "cover story" she > > trots out to hide the fact that she considers > > them the TM TB counterpart of niggers. > > > > It's the TRENDS, Raunchy, not the particulars. > > > > Absolutely. To say that she is neutral about people and only addresses issues > is absolute hypocrisy, all the LABELS (Emily take note) like 'master of > unintended irony', or calling Vaj a notorious liar are from her. She 'picks > her fights' as she says, and she loves fights, that is obvious, and she > thoroughly believes that you Barry are evil, she said so several times, (Can > be here or in a private exchange, but she believes it) It's visible since > decades. Many people in the past, including myself, who had a general > positive view of her abilities and her attitude, have seen this as her basic > weakness, and actually tried to persuade her from refraining from this > behaviour, which is mainly motivated by anger. > > If she would only be neutral, making points and pointing out logical flaws as > raunchydog wants to make us believe, why, I ask you, anyone, is she unable to > wish a happy birthday to her main adversary. She thinks she would be > hypocritical if she did so. She thinks it would be some kind of moodmaking, > as her FEELINGS are really the opposite. So much for her balanced and neutral > view. Barry, Vaj and Curtis, all say valuable things here, all make good > posts here, they may go overboard in the extend they make a point IMHO, but > it is simply wrong to not see the validity of what they have to say. So Judy > too has her good points, I can clearly see that, she also makes good posts, > once she pots with someone she has a positive view of. But the main > intercations are unfortunately these fights, and she definitely has a list of > adversaries, if it is a LIST or simply a mental list doesn't matter, and I > know it, she makes a certain switch at some point, and you are an adversary. > I don't want to complain, I can live with it, but I do see her modus operanti. >
"In ancient times there was a community known as the Goodnu's. As all communities did in these times the Goodnu's lived right on the river bank for trading, transportation and sustenance. Water was almighty and worshipped as a God. One day there was a tremendous hurricane far out in the ocean. It's ferocity blew a large flock of "Foo" birds way off course sending them inland many hundreds of miles and in the vicinity of the Goodnu's community. The Goodnu people had never seen a "Foo" bird and were quite curious as to it's sudden and obviously evil presence. The "Foo" bird, as we all know, is a very ugly, evil-looking bird. This caused the Goodnu people to become very uneasy believing they did something wrong to God and that this bird should be avoided. One day a "Foo" bird flew overhead and screeched: "Foo, Foo" and shit on a Goodnu's head. The man ran screaming into the river believing the Holy powers of the river would cleanse him of this evil turd and its consequences. As soon as the man washed this unholy turd from his ear canal he suddenly keeled over and died. The Goodnu's were now convinced of the "Foo" bird's evilness. The next day a woman was outside and heard: "Foo, Foo". Before she could react the "Foo" bird dropped a bomb landing a syrupy turd across her face. Shocked and panicked she ran into the river furiously washing her face of this sloppy stew. The village watched in horror as this woman also died once cleansed of the runny turd. The very next day a village wiseman heard those famous words: "Foo, Foo". He like others had witnessed the terrible deaths of two of his villages' people in the last two days. He too was struck right in the forehead by the "Foo" birds accurately guided turd missile. His first reaction was confusion and he sprinted towards the river. However, he stopped short and thought of his obvious demise should he cleanse the turd wafer from his forehead. He did not cleanse the poo pile from his forehead and lived. So the wiseman went to the other people of the village, gathered them around and stated to them: "There is an obvious lesson here my good people. The moral of this story is: 'If the Foo shits, wear it.'".
