I guess enlightementinessitude means never having
to say you're sorry. 

Or is that brats with no self (pun intended) control 
feel they must "act out" to get attention. 

So, Sri Bubba Jim-ji, when your advanced technique
teacher was whispering your instruction, did you 
think the teaching was for you to repeat " I I I me
me me" endlessly?     

--- In [email protected], "futur.musik" <futur.musik@...> wrote:
>
> Farting again, huh? I hope that clears up while you, along with Barry and 
> Curtis, continue looking for someone who fits your wonderfully childish 
> concept of what enlightenment is. In the meantime, might I suggest you keep 
> your distance from others, and possibly modify your diet? For you, the hot 
> air should come from your mouth and the waste from the other end. You have it 
> exactly reversed.
> 
> --- In [email protected], azgrey <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Nice graceful exit Flanigen.
> > 
> > Knowingly over-post and then come right back and post 
> > your childish "poopy pants" retort. 
> > 
> > How enlightened of you.
> > 
> > I think Curtis deserves a lot of credit for the grace, restraint,
> > and good humor he has displayed the last several days while 
> > being very personally maligned by a trio of world class nutcases.
> >    
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "futur.musik" <futur.musik@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have no delusions about enlightenment, Curtis, mine or anyone else's. 
> > > Nor do I believe in it. Sometimes stuff just happens. Nonetheless, if you 
> > > must judge me, judge me as ME, not some bullshit excuse to put down 
> > > enlightenment. And while you're at it, please remove your false teeth. :-)
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Imagine my surprise reading this: (actual explicit terms used will be 
> > > > substituted for non offensive ones)
> > > > 
> > > > Jim:
> > > > 
> > > > > I've made a joke or two about your man crush on Curtis, and believe I 
> > > > > made reference to you "practically wetting yourself" in anticipation 
> > > > > of his postings. Nothing sexual though. I never said, "Barry should 
> > > > > wear a JOHNSON SHAPED RAINCOAT before he has CABOOSE PLEASANTRIES 
> > > > > with Curtis", or "Barry oughta brush his teeth before ORALLY 
> > > > > MASSAGING THE TROUSER TROUT OF Curtis", or "It would be tough to give 
> > > > > Barry a VAYU ENHANCED GENITAL CLEANING, not cuz his VEDIC IMPULSE is 
> > > > > so small, but because he never learned to wipe himself properly, and 
> > > > > he stinks!".
> > > > 
> > > > Why are the sexually explicit attack rant tantrums so similar between 
> > > > the two individuals most invested in selling us all on the idea that 
> > > > they are functioning from a specially enhanced state of consciousness 
> > > > extolled by the Vedas as the goal of all human development, the highest 
> > > > state of human attainment and the one where if one so chose, he could 
> > > > enjoy CABOOSE PLEASANTRIES or ORALLY MASSAGE THE TROUSER TROUT of the 
> > > > creator of the universe himself? (Or I assume if she turns out to be a 
> > > > chick...well you known, just switch some stuff around and go for it.)  
> > > > And why are both so inappropriately homoerotic?
> > > > 
> > > > What was my grievous offense, that might deserve this stretching of the 
> > > > boundaries of propriety on a public board?  And why should I be the 
> > > > target since I had nothing whatsoever to do with this discussion?
> > > > 
> > > > With my interest in the educational development of children I have been 
> > > > exposed to some perspectives on tantrum behavior and I believe it may 
> > > > apply here.  Here is the scenario:
> > > > 
> > > > Let's call the kid Ravijimbo for the sake of this demonstration.
> > > > 
> > > > Ravimimbo:
> > > > "Can I have a lollipop?"
> > > > 
> > > > "This sentence, when uttered in a crowded supermarket, has the power to 
> > > > invoke a racing heart and sweating palms in many parents.
> > > > 
> > > > The answer is no. The child raises her voice. The answer is still no. 
> > > > The child drops to the floor. The answer turns into a discussion and 
> > > > the child's voice increases in volume. The tears flow, the shrieks 
> > > > begin and, after a few parental self-conscious glances at near by 
> > > > shoppers ? the answer becomes yes."  (From an internet tantrum info 
> > > > site.)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > So what is the lollipop being denied that in the context of this public 
> > > > forum leads to this meltdown behavior going way beyond what is 
> > > > necessary to make their point?  I believe it is that I withhold the 
> > > > thing they seek, going along with their self-perception that they are 
> > > > living in a superior state of mind than the rest of us.  I have never 
> > > > attacked either of these guys in this manor, but I am an outspoken 
> > > > advocate for a POV which negates the core of their claim to be living 
> > > > in a state extravagantly termed enlightenment.
> > > > 
> > > > So we have two similar meltdowns which escalates the behavior in public 
> > > > to the extreme in an attempt to express the rage felt at being denied 
> > > > the one thing they most covet, and which they feel entitled to: being 
> > > > treated as if they are the specialist boy in the whole wide world.  
> > > > "Yes they are, yes they are, where's that smile, there it is, there it 
> > > > is."
> > > > 
> > > > Your outburst was childish and uncalled for Jim, as was Ravi's before 
> > > > you. You seem like a kindergartner lacking in self-awareness and 
> > > > self-control,(I hear TM is good for that.) throwing obnoxious sand into 
> > > > the eyes of readers here.  I hope you will do a little introspection 
> > > > during your much deserved time out.
> > > > 
> > > > If you really look deeply into your heart of hearts, you may find that 
> > > > I am not the only one who has doubts about your superior state of mind. 
> > > >  And if you can face that, I'm here to say that it isn't so bad seeing 
> > > > yourself as an ordinary person.  Your self-delusion sets you up for 
> > > > this kind of fall.  Why don't you orally massage THAT lolli?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to