--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > -- In [email protected], "Buck" wrote: > > > > Yep, I should hope the FFL moderators would enforce the highest levels of > > civility here. This one guy is manifiestly bad. "When in doubt, kick them > > out". Tough love. Are the threads of FFL to be thus polluted with his > > abusive crap? No, unsubscribe him now. We don't need his kind of abusive > > crap in the threads of FFL. We've got much more important things to talk > > about here. Git rid of him. He stopped having things to say in any civil > > way a long while ago. > > As much as I really appreciate your kind intention here, I just can't > reconcile this with the kind of freedom we want here. This is the case that > proves the principle isn't it? What is the price of freedom and are we > willing to pay it? Personally I am. > >
CurtisDb, not everyone needs to belong to every group and groups have a right to protect their normative values from individuals who would seek to subvert and overthrow them. What does this guy really share with this group? He got interviewed at one point by Rick? As far as I can see he has nothing to do with Fairfield and holds a lot of contempt for most of what is here. He deserves to be unsubscribed to protect our larger group life. It would be a good sacrifice to make for the community to have the moderators unsubscribe the guy. Banishment and shunning has their place for survival of the group culture. He is plainly a communal malefic here. Git rid of him. Best Regards, -Buck > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > Ravi has been mounting a campaign to spread malicious lies about me on > > > this message board. I hope anyone interested in researching me or > > > checking up on my character will take the time do a search on this > > > individual's posts here so that you can understand what I am dealing > > > with. This is not an uncommon phenomenon in this Internet age of freedom > > > of expression. > > > > > > This individual does not know me personally, or have any inside > > > information about me. > > > > > >
