--- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> >
> > LOL..
> > 
> > Krishna's darling Gopi, Obba to the rescue.
> > 
> 
> Had to bring pani, quench the wounds of the western ambush  
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQMyGKj0Z4Y   
> 
> > Everyone here supposedly uses false handles except perhaps for a few folks 
> > such as Rick, Bob and I.
> > 
> Usernames are a good thing, and I really am Obbajeeba.
> 
> > Yet these people go on and on with their inane discussions. OK yes I admit 
> > to having insulted the handles - curtisfeltablues and turquoiseb, 
> > shukra69..LOL..
> > 
> 
> The best of entertainment!
> 
> > Oh no curtisfeltablues wants to enter the high tech industry since the 
> > spare change he makes from his trailer trash, hillbilly music is not enough 
> > and Ravi Chivukula spread malicious lies on the handle 
> > curtisfeltablues..LOL..
> > 
> If one has a slave job that the employers seek the wild west internet forums, 
> then one should not use the Internet forums. This is the wild west and some 
> people want to tame it to their slave conditionings?
> 
> 
> > They are so attached to even the fake id's they create but it's all 
> > opinion, POV's as they say, no truth as curtisfeltablues and turquoiseb 
> > constantly remind us. Aah but why does it hurt so much. I think I really 
> > hit at curtisfeltablues's weaknesses, there's gotta be something more to 
> > this that he doesn't want to admit. Clearly there's more and he wants this 
> > discussion to end..:-)
> > 
> The mud slingin ain't comin from one direction, Paw. What I mean is ain't no 
> truth comin from one side neither, right Paw?
> Yep, its in the brain, what ticks one off.
> 
> 
> > What pathetic, false lives they live, false beliefs they insulate 
> > themselves.
> > 
> Well, ya know what?  I think they be a lil rough around the edges from life 
> taken a beaten on them, or bein conditioned to blame.  
> 
> > Hypocrisy and ridiculousness rules supreme here.
> > 
> > 
> Yep, uh huh. Sure is thick around here and easy to spot. No wonder thems, 
> theys thinks we are on teams. Them being the adversary to truth. Theys not 
> wrong, jus don't see without the fog lifting once in while. You have cut the 
> fog and it was clear before theys figur'd out what they woas  lookin at. Kind 
> of shockin to youngin souls, Ravi.
> 
> The funniest thang would be all of us of FFL sittin at a round table, staring 
> at each other face to face and I know you would lovingly embrace each and 
> everyone of em, right Paw?
> You have heart. (;;;\/;;;)
>                  \;;;;;;/
>                   \;;;;/
>                    \;;/    
>                     \/
> 
Dang Paw! You'd think that was suppos'd to be a heart, above, but thems 
actually groups of divided CanCan dancers. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCZs__8EnVE
Sorry to confuse.


> > On Jan 8, 2012, at 5:50 PM, obbajeeba <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Nice sunset, Ravi.
> > > But,I think you posted a lie. The lie is the sun has set and it not the 
> > > same view as before since you posted this photo. So that is not telling 
> > > the truth, because now is all that exists and you called that a sunset. 
> > > No lying allowed on FFL. Nope. Everyone needs to just tell the truth. 
> > > Name, birth date, social security numbers (those are supposed to be 
> > > confidential, but credit card companies can use them now.) Driver's 
> > > license numbers and insurance agent. Please give a detailed education 
> > > background,including preschools attended. 
> > > Mobil phone numbers are a must! Please show any and all medical records 
> > > and all court orders on your profile, it is necessary as the wayback 
> > > machine counsels you to do so http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F13urnxh3w4. 
> > > The sun has not set, Ravi. Ravi shines from all locations from the center 
> > > of our solar system. The rest of us only get to view his greatness as we 
> > > spin around all crazy and such, thousands of miles per hour, no wonder 
> > > our heads are spinning, thinking Ravi lies. : )
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sunset, Venice Beach Jan 8, 2011
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/73243621@N07/6663473701
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I even saw a couple of girls in bikinis, hello welcome to Southern 
> > > > > California :-). I can for at least look past Ravi's unhealed personal 
> > > > > wounds and share in the joy of families and couples around.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I thought I would post out by Monday so I can focus on work. I 
> > > > > clearly have failed :-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >> OK cool. I have moved on, to the beach, to watch the beautiful 
> > > > >> Sunset. Living a block away from a crowded beach is such a pleasure.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Love,
> > > > >> Ravi
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:36 PM, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula 
> > > > >>> <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > Susan,
> > > > >>> > 
> > > > >>> > I'm sorry why would Judy need to be accountable for anything. She 
> > > > >>> > knew exactly why I was intentionally lying. I acknowledged I was 
> > > > >>> > lying as well.
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> Ok, but it would be simpler and certainly would be kinder not to 
> > > > >>> lie to start with, even if you are replying to lies of others. As 
> > > > >>> we all know, lying by one person does not justify lying by another. 
> > > > >>> It simply perpetuates the mess.
> > > > >>> > 
> > > > >>> > It's just hypocritical for you to create categories and grades of 
> > > > >>> > lies. Barry, Vaj and Curtis lie regularly though Curtis much more 
> > > > >>> > subtle, complex. And they don't even admit to their lying and 
> > > > >>> > deception, they have so much emotional investment.
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> I guess we all have emotional investment. I can think of little in 
> > > > >>> my life that is objective.
> > > > >>> > 
> > > > >>> > Just because I stretch the limits and go overboard in my lying 
> > > > >>> > that you are forced to even acknowledge, confront it. 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> You would be acknowledged without lying and also without being so 
> > > > >>> wild.
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> Curtis starts acting like a wimp, a victim.
> > > > >>> > 
> > > > >>> > This is just ridiculous and hypocritical.
> > > > >>> > 
> > > > >>> > 
> > > > >>> > On Jan 8, 2012, at 3:59 PM, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote:
> > > > >>> > 
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" 
> > > > >>> > > <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > 
> > > > >>> > > > 
> > > > >>> > > > My perspective on Judy has certainly changed over time. From 
> > > > >>> > > > one of
> > > > >>> > > > mostly a critic to someone who often respects and is in 
> > > > >>> > > > agreement with
> > > > >>> > > > her opinions and observations.
> > > > >>> > > > 
> > > > >>> > > > But here is something I have found instructive. Judy was 
> > > > >>> > > > asked, twice,
> > > > >>> > > > if she felt Ravi had gone overboard in his slandering of 
> > > > >>> > > > Curtis. (New
> > > > >>> > > > Years Eve incident) (Please allow me proceed with this term, 
> > > > >>> > > > since
> > > > >>> > > > there has been no evidence to suggest that Curtis engaged in 
> > > > >>> > > > the
> > > > >>> > > > behavior for which he accused)
> > > > >>> > > > 
> > > > >>> > > > She was asked this question by someone who I consider an 
> > > > >>> > > > honest broker
> > > > >>> > > > -wayback71. Judy evidently objected to the way the question 
> > > > >>> > > > was phrased
> > > > >>> > > > and would not answer it. Later on she finally provided some 
> > > > >>> > > > answer. 
> > > > >>> > > > By that time I did not pay much attention to it, but one 
> > > > >>> > > > thing she said
> > > > >>> > > > was, and I believe I have the quote correct, or correct 
> > > > >>> > > > enough, "Susan
> > > > >>> > > > knows I don't endorse lying..."
> > > > >>> > > > 
> > > > >>> > > > Well, if a person doesn't endorse lying, then at one point do 
> > > > >>> > > > you stand
> > > > >>> > > > up and oppose it?
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > > Exactly. We all know Judy would normally stand up right away - 
> > > > >>> > > within seconds - if someone, anyone, even a friend, was lying. 
> > > > >>> > > She missed this one.
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > > > 
> > > > >>> > > > Then today, in an exchange with Curtis, we find that this 
> > > > >>> > > > oppostion to
> > > > >>> > > > "lying" is conditional as to whether a person "deserves" to 
> > > > >>> > > > be defended
> > > > >>> > > > from lying. Evidently she feels, or felt that Curtis was not 
> > > > >>> > > > entitled
> > > > >>> > > > to this defending. Or that the slander was not sufficient 
> > > > >>> > > > enough to
> > > > >>> > > > warrant addressing it. Well if that is the case, then don't 
> > > > >>> > > > make a
> > > > >>> > > > blanket statment that "so and so knows I oppose lying"
> > > > >>> > > > 
> > > > >>> > > > What do you think?
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > > Of course I agree with you! As you said, I did ask her twice, 
> > > > >>> > > humbling myself the second time so as give her an chance to 
> > > > >>> > > answer. Judy could have used that question to begin to distance 
> > > > >>> > > herself from Ravi's lie, from anyone's lying in a hurtful and 
> > > > >>> > > malicious way here. But she dug in.
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > > I too find many of Judy's posts interesting and filled with 
> > > > >>> > > intelligence and honesty. That is why I was so surprised that 
> > > > >>> > > she would not call Ravi on intentionally lying about Curtis. 
> > > > >>> > > Judy was right - I do know that she opposes lying, but IMO she 
> > > > >>> > > went astray on this one and should have piped up. 
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > > I suspect that at this point, regardless of all the other 
> > > > >>> > > complex discussion, Judy made a few bad choices on this one. 
> > > > >>> > > She can be Ravi's friend, ignore or call him on lies, and move 
> > > > >>> > > on. Basically I think we all share the same feeling that gross 
> > > > >>> > > and malicious lying about significant issues - the kind of 
> > > > >>> > > stuff that can hurt your reputation out in real life - is not 
> > > > >>> > > welcome here, not about anyone. 
> > > > >>> > > 
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to