--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > If freedom of speech never existed, the blues would have never existed. > > > > > That you would even frame this issue that way shows what a partisan thinker > you are. Convenient. > > But as for the blues you couldn't be more wrong. It was the limits imposed > by the sense of proprietary of the day that lead the the brilliant figurative > language of the blues. Listen to L'll Wayne and Robert Johnson and you will > understand how valuable certain limits are for the creative process. > > >
A free thinker. As for the blues, I couldn't be more right. If you and I were invited to a nice Mississippi home, and you started telling the invite how you know about the blues, I can guarantee the invite would be happy to see you leave by midnight. I would get to hang out with Paw and Ma, till the wee hours watching the sunrise on the Delta, eating Ma's fresh cornbread for breakfast. Partisan my masala and black eyed peas. Yes and so does binding of the feet http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Pnf1S8uhNg > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > Fornication Under the Command of the King, You, Curtis. > > > > How dare you write about someone's mental health and diagnosing it > > > > without a license, after they are removed from the forum. > > > > That is one sad blues tune, dude. Shame on you. > > > > > > I diagnosed nothing. We know the facts of the situation from his own > > > words. Without the wacky spiritual enabling, we had a sad case from the > > > get go. And news flash, its all brain chemistry, including your ability > > > to restrain yourself with an appropriate level of insult. > > > > > > So shame back on you. I consider my view to be much more compassionate > > > than yours. > > > > > If freedom of speech never existed, the blues would have never existed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I find 90% of Ravi's posts amusing and interesting. > > > > > > Compared to 90% of the posts from Curtis which I find brimming with > > > > > > boring self-adorations, disgusting moralism or rants against God or > > > > > > Maharishi from an ego on the verge of exploding in self-importance. > > > > > > > > > > > > So there ! :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your post kind of illustrates the difference doesn't it Nabbie? Your > > > > > post was much more thoughtfully insulting than anything he ever > > > > > wrote, but you did it in a totally non-malicious way. You didn't > > > > > drop a bunch of F bombs and MF bombs and you didn't accuse me of > > > > > something false that could hurt me in real life. You got your buzz > > > > > from putting me down but no animals or humans were hurt in the making > > > > > of your insults. > > > > > > > > > > I think rpost reflects the more thoughtful nature of the place. But > > > > > that is just my opinion and now the tribe and tribal leaders have > > > > > spoken. > > > > > > > > > > And there are no winners here. I have always believed that we were > > > > > dealing with a betrayal of brain chemistry so I can only wish him > > > > > well on his rocky road ahead. Kids road even rockier. > > > > > > > > > > This is no cause for celebration for me. But I'm glad the change was > > > > > made. I suspect it caused everyone to consider what line we want to > > > > > encircle us as we gather here for conversation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fornication Under the Command of the King, You, Curtis. > > > > How dare you write about someone's mental health and diagnosing it > > > > without a license, after they are removed from the forum. > > > > That is one sad blues tune, dude. Shame on you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > > > > > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While I do not object to Ravi's rants, I do feel he is > > > > > > > > exceeding > > > > > > > > social interaction limits, like a guest shitting on one's > > > > > > > > dining > > > > > > > > room table. So I support Curtis's position here. I think it > > > > > > > > prudent for Ravi to tone it down. It is not playful, and it is > > > > > > > > not helpful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I, for one, would love to see who agrees with this > > > > > > > statement, and who does not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Step up to the line and declare your allegiance with > > > > > > > Ravi, or do the opposite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then live with it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find 90% of Ravi's posts amusing and interesting. > > > > > > Compared to 90% of the posts from Curtis which I find brimming with > > > > > > boring self-adorations, disgusting moralism or rants against God or > > > > > > Maharishi from an ego on the verge of exploding in self-importance. > > > > > > > > > > > > So there ! :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
