--- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a list of quotes from repubs when Clinton went to war: > > > "You can support the troops but not the president." > --Rep Tom Delay (R-TX) > > "Well, I just think it's a bad idea. What's going to happen is they're > going to be over there for 10, 15, maybe 20 years." > --Joe Scarborough (R-FL) > > "Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come > home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?" > --Sean Hannity, Fox News, 4/6/99 > > "[The] President . . . is once again releasing American military might > on a foreign country with an ill-defined objective and no exit strategy. > He has yet to tell the Congress how much this operation will cost. And > he has not informed our nation's armed forces about how long they will > be away from home. These strikes do not make for a sound foreign policy." > --Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) > > "American foreign policy is now one huge big mystery. Simply put, the > administration is trying to lead the world with a feel-good foreign > policy." > --Rep Tom Delay (R-TX) > > "If we are going to commit American troops, we must be certain they have > a clear mission, an achievable goal and an exit strategy." > --Karen Hughes, speaking on behalf of George W Bush > > "I had doubts about the bombing campaign from the beginning . . I didn't > think we had done enough in the diplomatic area." > --Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) > > "I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is > often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just > learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with > very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, > these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarified rules of > engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of > victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no > clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our over- extended > military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests > are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President > started this thing, and there still is no plan today" > --Rep Tom Delay (R-TX) > > "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to > explain to us what the exit strategy is." > --Governor George W. Bush (R-TX)
so, then, am I to assume that: 1) You agree with the Republicans quoted above? 2) You agree with the Democrats/liberals who are saying the same things today about the Iraq war? 3) You agree with both Republicans who dissed Clinton AND the Democrats/Liberals of today? 4) YOu disagree with them all? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
