In honor of International Women's Day I must say they are certainly having their day, and say, right here at FFL. Raunchydog, you make me proud to share your gender.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Emily Reyn wrote: > > > > > I thought Vaj was also referring to some private correspondence > > > with Curtis because that's how he was playing it. > > > > > > Since C. clues us in to what the content was, I believe that makes > > clear what the aforementioned email to Judy really was about. Without > > that information it still was pretty clear, but his little clue made > > it clear for those that want to hear. > > > > Of course there are those who listen but rarely hear what's being > > said - and then spend day after day defending that imaginary world. > > So it's inevitable that the song and dance will begin: it always > > does, that the nature of denial. > > > > But no, this has nothing to do with the tapes of Robin pounding > > people on stage. > > > > Vaj seems to use "email" and "post" and "letter" pretty much interchangeably, > so it takes a minute to figure out whether he's talking about private > correspondence or public posts. After I read Judy's post, it's quite clear > that Vaj was referring to the Judy/Robin irony duel, which he apparently took > seriously. > > Now Vaj is claiming that a private communication about Judy between Robin and > Curtis, given that it was negative, somehow "proves" that Robin's > denouncing-Judy post was actually serious. > > Judy and Robin's brilliant irony duel took place early in January, long after > Curtis and Robin had definitively "split up" at the end of October. It's not > likely they had any email correspondence after that, which means Vaj is still > mistaken that Robin's letter "blasting" Judy was actually serious. > > So Curtis, it looks like your plan to cause trouble between Judy and Robin > seems to have failed pretty miserably. And now Vaj is screwing things up with > his own passel of red herrings. > > Come on Curtis, you've dangled the alleged stinky email in front of our noses > long enough, now we want a whiff. It's time to man up. Does the email exist? > If it exists, do you have the balls to quote what Robin wrote? >
