I liked it Emily, it looked like a newspaper teaser from 1940. I thought you meant to do that. It is a good technique, I will remember it for the future.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > Whoops, this font size was a mistake...my formatting has failed....is this > better? > > > ________________________________ > From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 9:43 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Curtis's Hypocrisy: Still Stunning (was Re: The > Debilitating Effects of > > > I could be wrong...yes, I could.  I think Ann's latest post to Curtis asks > for clarification on this point.  Was Curtis bluffing?  Was it a shot below > the belt?  Will Curtis come clean on his intentions for saying what he did? >  Is it, as Judy mentioned, relevant?  Or, an inserted distraction?  Is the > plot thickening or waning?  Was Vaj just throwing out another bomb?  Will > it all come out during Judy's off-time?  Hmmmmm......we shall see.....or > not, as the case may be.  > > > ________________________________ > From: seventhray1 <steve.sundur@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 9:36 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Curtis's Hypocrisy: Still Stunning (was Re: The > Debilitating Effects of > > >  > Kinda funny. I knew exactly what you meant the first time around, Emily. > But I also knew what Vaj meant with his comment.  I don't think Vaj was > trying to "play" it. Vaj assumed, as I would have, that the great parody, > which has won rave reviews, was not a parody after all. That seems a > logical conclusion based on what we can infer from Curtis's private > communication with Robin. > Oh, and ain't it swell that Judy can't respond to this for at least 20 > hours......................26 minutes........................and three > seconds. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > Correction: > > > > The whole allusion to a personal communique disparagingàJudy....:) > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 9:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Curtis's Hypocrisy: Still Stunning (was Re: > > The Debilitating Effects of > > > > > > <snip> > > "(Don't sweat it if you are lurking Robin. I'll take this > > one for the team.)" > > > > > > I'll admit, I took this as a humorous comment. à> > > > The whole allusion to a personal communique disparaging was also a shot > > below the belt and unnecessary - which Vaj picked up on and tried to play > > as well. But, no one is perfect - this > exchange just confirms the fact that we don't all live in the same > reality.à> > > > I'm not taking sides on this one....except for one point re: the comment > > alluding to Judy's age. àAgeism, like sexism, bothers me. Examples > > include: à> > > > Barry: > > > > "Try to *imagine* anything more pathetic than a 70-year-oldwoman feeling > > that "winning" an argument on the Internet > > is something valuable, something to be achieved." > > > > Curtis: > > > > "The fact is that you tried to overlay a negative spin on my actual words. I > > just showed you how this doesn't make sense in the context what I wrote. And > > what is your response? To repeat your accusations like a tiny Sicilian > > woman in > > an ancient church, hunched over with her bony shoulders covered with a black > > spider web shawl, in front of a small stature of St. Anthony, fingering her > > beads while her > mouth, as crinkled at the edges as crumpled paper, mouths the > > words of the rosary again and again and again." > > > > Curtis, objectively, you are really a creative writer - you should do a > > short story. àSend the proceeds to Judy. > > > > > > The art of deception > > Is a magician's illusion > > To make oneââ¬â¢s perception > > Become their conclusion > > > > ~yobarney, 2009 > > > > Bashar - Infinite Parallel Realitiesà> > (This has some pretty good lines actually) > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38khp3UkWIw > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: authfriend jstein@ > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 3:58 PM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Curtis's Hypocrisy: Still Stunning (was Re: The > > Debilitating Effects of > > > > > > à> > --- > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > > So Curtis, it looks like your plan to cause trouble > > > > between Judy and Robin seems to have failed pretty > > > > miserably. > > > > > > Robin doesn't post here anymore. How exactly could > > > anything I post get in between them? > > > > From Curtis's initial post: > > > > "(Don't sweat it if you are lurking Robin. I'll take this > > one for the team.)" > > > > From one of his follow-ups: > > > > "I see that ignorance is bliss. Fair enough. It would be up > > to Robin to level this playing field." > > > > Seems like *Curtis* hoped it might cause some trouble. > > > > <snip> > > > I am letting her know that from my > perspective, since Robin > > > was an equal opportunity accuser, she wouldn't be so smug > > > with her use of his quotes if she knew what he thought of > > > her. If they are chummy now he can share it in the same > > > spirit of "improvement" he let me have it from. He > > > considered talking with people this way as an important > > > aspect of his "friendship". I don't. > > > > Robin doesn't need to "share" a thing with me, Curtis. > > I quote what he thought of you because he articulated > > so much better than I could what *I* think of you. > > > > What he may have thought of me in the past, or what he > > may think of me now, is of zero relevance here. You > > attempted to insinuate that something he said to you > > privately was somehow relevant to the conflict between > > you and me, and you failed. > > > > Except that you've shown yourself to be the > kind of > > person who retaliates against people with whom he has > > issues by betraying the confidentiality of private > > correspondence in an attempt to create bad feelings > > between them. > > > > That comes as no surprise to me, and I doubt it would > > come as a surprise to Robin. It may, however, startle > > some others who had perceived you to be a person of > > integrity. But they'll have to speak for themselves. > > >
