--- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > According to MMY, everything is based in consciousness. If there wasn't any > consciousness, there wouldn't be any existence or creativity. So, for any > universe to manifest, IMO there would have to be a consciousness to create > width, length, and height, at the very least. The dimension of time could be > optional. IOW, this universe would be similar to an empty box and nothing > else.
But why would there need to be a consciousness? There are simpler ways to get the universe going without recourse to anything mystical. I also don't think time could be optional as it is simply what happens when there is matter present, interactions will take time to happen, so unless everything stays perfectly still which is exactly what *didn't* happen with creation there will be time. > --- In [email protected], "shainm307" <shainm307@> wrote: > > > > Interesting thing for all the Fairfielders: In a channeling of pleiadians I > > heard "the difference between consciousness and existence is creativity" > > kind of goes against Maharishi, unless Maharishi was just going very broad. > > >
