--- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote: [...] > This is a pointless conversation as the TMO makes all sorts > of claims about consciousness that are easy to understand > but it when pressed it turns out they don't mean anything! >
THey don't mean or imply anything special in the context of already-measured events. However, assuming that the ME is real, Yogic Flying, 3rd (4th?) stage is real, etc., the theory is "waiting in the wings." > Why make big deal about the spiritual world and cosmic > awareness if it turns out that you are saying the same thing > as everyone else. I'm not going to phrase that as a question > as the answer will most likely be another step back from > what MMY originally meant by us experiencing the home of all > the laws of nature. Which is what I'm disputing and you are > agreeing with but using MMYs language. So let's forget it, > at least until Hagelin says something stupid again. > See above. Also, if one sees the universe as a connectionist system, then, a localized connectionist system might be a good simulation of the whole, if the correspondence of the various parts is close enough. In a sense, Unity Consciousness can be said to be a simulation of that Whole, assuming the above. > > > > You do know there doesn't have to be a unified field? > > > > > > > Most scientists are reductionists, but yes, science doesn't require that > > all fields of inquiry converge towards a single TOE. > > > > > > K, > > K? > Typo for L. L
