--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <snip>
> > You see, Judy, I am much more jaded.  I will NOT waste my time 
> > reading through 11 pages of platitudes and superlatives to find 
out 
> > what I should have gotten in the first paragraph.
> > 
> > So, yes, I am lazy. From experience, the TMO has taught me to 
be...
> > 
> > But kudos to you for having the time in your day to actually 
READ 
> > ALL of the Movement's publications.  It must be heartwarming to 
the 
> > scribes that spit out this stuff in Holland to know that a TBer 
is 
> > taking the time out to actually READ this stuff...
> 
> Actually I only read it when there's a good
> reason to do so--say if I have made a claim
> about something and it's challenged.  Then I
> may well read the whole thing to see whether
> my claim holds up or not, 'cause I'd look
> awfully silly quoting something in the early
> paragraphs as support when it turns out
> something later on showed I was wrong.




I'll call you disingenious instead of just outright calling you a 
liar, Judy, which is what you are so quick to call others.

On October 16, 1998 at 12:00 a.m. in reference to Tony Nader and the 
gold, you said: "That's what the news release said explicitly that 
the gold was to be used for."




> 
> <snip>
> > > > Just the fact that the movement had to qualify what is was 
that 
> > > > Nader actually "received" by saying that the money was to 
> > > > be "deposited in a bank" -- where else was he going to keep 
> > > > it...under his mattress -- suggests some sneaky wording and 
> > > > shenanigans going on.
> > > 
> > > Uh, no, it doesn't.  This was all quite
> > > straightforward as far as the transfer of money
> > > was concerned.  The point wasn't bank vs.
> > > mattress; it was that the money wasn't for his
> > > personal use.
> > 
> > Gee, then say it in the first paragraph, don't call it 
an "award" 
> > and don't say that Nader "received" the money.
> 
> As I already pointed out, this is standard
> language.  Scientists "receive awards" of money
> to continue their research all the time, and
> that's exactly how the process is described.
> Nothing at all misleading about it.
> 
> > > > Sorry, Judy, it was a horrible "publicity stunt" and one 
that 
> > was 
> > > > not successful at all.
> > > 
> > > As I said, it was extremely successful, got all
> > > kinds of coverage at the time.  It did just what
> > > publicity stunts are supposed to do: enticed
> > > reporters to attend in order to hear the spiel,
> > > in the hope that some of them will reproduce some 
> > > of it in their news stories, which they did.  The
> > > TM folks got to talk about the scientific research
> > > on TM, including Nader's, and just generally pitch
> > > TM and its theories as a formula for fixing the
> > > world.
> > 
> > Yeah, it worked out really, really well.
> > 
> > It really increased the credibility of TM and the TMO in the 
eyes 
> > of all the mainstream reporters that either attended the press 
> > conference or read about it.  Yeah, they really took seriously a 
> > purported scientist and grown man sitting on a scale having 
himself 
> > weighed in gold.
> 
> They all knew it was a publicity stunt, Shemp.
> But it was a splashy, fun story, and in order to
> have a basis for publishing it, they had to put in
> a little something about the TM research and the
> goals of the movement, which was why the stunt
> was devised in the first place.  It accomplished
> exactly what the TMO wanted it to accomplish.
> 
> Reporters, and most people with any sense,
> understand about publicity stunts.  They
> enjoy the stunt and hopefully absorb a little
> of the substance.
> 
> If you're objecting that they'd have found the
> substance foolish, it's a different story, as I said:
> 
> > > Then your argument is with TM
> > > for having such a spiel in the first place, not for
> > > holding publicity stunts to promote the spiel.
> > > That's what publicity stunts *do*, promote spiels.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to