--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > You know, sparaig, TM will be just as effective for you -- 
> > maybe 
> > > > > even more so! -- if you didn't subscribe to the 
> pronouncements 
> > > of 
> > > > > the cult that has taken over the propagation of the TM 
> > Program.  
> > > > > Your mindset of blind belief simply is NOT a requirement 
for 
> TM 
> > > to 
> > > > > work...
> > > > 
> > > > That's the same bogus accusation Barry makes use
> > > > of constantly.
> > > > 
> > > > Pointing out that a criticism is not soundly based
> > > > is *not* the same as expressing blind belief.
> > > > 
> > > > As I said, the criticism here is verging on the
> > > > pathological.  This is yet another example: when
> > > > someone attempts to inject a little fairness and
> > > > an objective fact or two, and they're painted as a
> > > > "blind believer" because they don't buy into
> > > > the critics' extreme negative bias.
> > > 
> > > Actually, the blind believer moniker came about because you 
> simply 
> > > couldn't see the absurdity of pressing me on whether Nader's 
> > > degrees were "made-up" at the same time you were referring to 
> him 
> > > as a "King".  It is the simple fact that you don't "get it" 
that 
> > > puts you in the "blind believer" category for me.
> > 
> > Actually it's a "blind un-believer" trait not
> > to be able to consider Nader's degrees separately
> > from his "king" title.
> 
> May I ask you something, Judy:
> 
> You are down on record as stating that you believe the whole "Nader 
> getting his weight in gold" episode was a publicity stunt.
> 
> Would you please be kind enough to tell me whether each of the 
> following were publicity stunts, too? (a simple "yes" or "no" 
beside 
> each one would suffice...)

ALL of the following have a "Publicity Stunt" component. Just about 
everything MMY has ever done, at least that gets mention in the 
press, has such a component. Why else get it mentioned in the press?


> 
> Naming Tony Nader as "King".
> 
> Naming a whole bunch of Movement people as "kings" or, 
> rather "Rajas".
> 
> Calling for a $600 billion bond issue for Maharishi Vedic 
> Agriculture.
> 
> Praising dictators Castro and Mugabe.
> 
> Condemning Britain as a "scorpion nation" and ceasing all teaching 
> of TM there.
> 
> Declaring that all bad things in the world come from the U.S.
> 
> Damning Democracy.
> 
> Declaring that Israel are "murderers" (sic).
> 
> Calling for the building of the world's tallest office tower.
> 
> Creating the National Law Party.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to