--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > I tried to start this conversation once before, in > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/316898>, > > but no one bit. Ever the patient fisherman, I shall troll again. :-) > > > > What IS the relationship of attachment to enlightenment? > > For the record, if anyone out there *does* have anything > interesting to say on this question, I'm all ears, and > would enjoy hearing your take on it. I was going to reply to this today, but it seems a family excursion has materialised, along with other work kind of work, and I will have to delay a response, but I have been thinking about this because the issue of attachment results in a lot of anguish in spiritual circles, even as it decimates the lives of those non-enlightenment people that fill most of the globe. Am I attached to answering this because I have a definitive point of view to present on this, or, am I non attached because I am going to do something else, but yet still attached because I intend to revisit this later? Or do I nonchalantly merely voice an opinion, baseless in knowledge, because I like to hear the sound of my own thinking. Will I be trying to impress Barry by some mind swaggering response that will, in the end, eventually bowl him over with peals of holy holy Xeno falling from his surrendered lips? Just wait, because I really do not know all that much. Prepare ye to be underwhelmed. And maybe I will not even write anything.
